BigOrangeTrain
Morior Invictus
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 76,896
- Likes
- 88,385
Nope. Never said that’s the only metric to rate an NIL. But being able to get big time recruits is a huge part of it. That’s what NIL was marketed as right? That’s what most of us expected it to be when it was implemented. Spyre could, in conjunction with Heupel and the staff, evaluate who to make deals with.Given this, since GA has the best recruiting class, your assumption is they have the best NIL? Do you believe that's entirely how to rate how well a school's NIL works: who has the highest ranking class at the end of the year?
I'm doubtful that's the whole picture.
Funny how you say this about UGA. Most agree that TAMUs historic class was bought with NIL. They have unlimited money blah, blah, blah. So was that not the whole picture with that situation? If no, what else was involved?
Now addressing UGA. There are a few teams who are true outliers, exceptions in the NIL era. UGA is one of them. Their roster is so stacked they really don’t need NIL that much. But please answe me this. What makes you think our NIL is so good? Because the services that rank NIL say so?