Yes, a "good" quarterback would have done much better than the true freshman Worley did against MTSU. Worley was only 21-31 or 32 for 289 yards, if this old withered brain recalls correctly. Also, as a sophomore, 8-11 against Vandy with an int. caused by Patterson, and a bounce off Hunter's facemask in the endzone for a sure TD.
Let's see, we are up to about 29 of 40 ish. It's a shame that he doesn't meet your strict requirements. Bray, on the other hand, really shined against Vandy last year. I seem to remember about 11 of 29 for just a hair over 100 yards, and 2 interceptions. I will look these figures up later. These stats are off the top of an old gray head.
I left this post up, instead of editing it, so you could check on my brain cells. I sold Worley a tad short. Against MTSU, he was 23-32 for the same 289 yards. Worley's Vandy stats are correct as previously stated. This gives a total of 31-43 for 340 yards in those 2 games.Yes, a "good" quarterback would have done much better than the true freshman Worley did against MTSU. Worley was only 21-31 or 32 for 289 yards, if this old withered brain recalls correctly. Also, as a sophomore, 8-11 against Vandy with an int. caused by Patterson, and a bounce off Hunter's facemask in the endzone for a sure TD.
Let's see, we are up to about 29 of 40 ish. It's a shame that he doesn't meet your strict requirements. Bray, on the other hand, really shined against Vandy last year. I seem to remember about 11 of 29 for just a hair over 100 yards, and 2 interceptions. I will look these figures up later. These stats are off the top of an old gray head.
If you start a freshman in the SEC you are asking for your head to be handed to you on a platter.hmy:
I looked up the 40 yard dash times for our quarterbacks. Worley, Peterman, and Ferguson all at 4.8. Dobbs is either a 4.7 or a 4.94 , depending on which you believe. I couldn't find one listed for High. Apparently, speed is not going to be a factor in choosing a qb. Some may be more elusive or more durable running, but none are that fast.
This is true. My thinking is that if have players who are stronger, faster, or more elusive than your qb, then they should be the ones running the ball. If a qb is able to make plays with his feet, and all receivers are covered, it is a bonus to have a qb who can take off. If not, throw it or hand it off.Don't have to be fast to hand the ball off.
Good grief. I never stated Worley was dog meat, just that he hasn't really shined in the games he's played in. Matt Simms also had a decent completion percentage in 2010, but that didn't make him a star....and it didn't help him keep his starting job.Darn you, 1972! Stop confusing that guy with facts mixed with 600lbs of common sense. You ought to know better.
It could partially be that was because Simms started against Oregon, Florida, LSU, Georgia, Alabama, and So. Carolina. When it came time to play against a team that he might be able to beat like Memphis, Ole Miss, Vandy, and Kentucky, he had been replaced by Bray. Don't let the facts of playing against the 6 toughest teams on the schedule hit you in the bum on your way out the door.Good grief. I never stated Worley was dog meat, just that he hasn't really shined in the games he's played in. Matt Simms also had a decent completion percentage in 2010, but that didn't make him a star....and it didn't help him keep his starting job.
Matt Simms Stats | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
Don't let the facts hit you in the bum on the way out the door.
Good grief. I never stated Worley was dog meat, just that he hasn't really shined in the games he's played in. Matt Simms also had a decent completion percentage in 2010, but that didn't make him a star....and it didn't help him keep his starting job.
Matt Simms Stats | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
Don't let the facts hit you in the bum on the way out the door.
Good grief. I never stated Worley was dog meat, just that he hasn't really shined in the games he's played in. Matt Simms also had a decent completion percentage in 2010, but that didn't make him a star....and it didn't help him keep his starting job.
Matt Simms Stats | College Football at Sports-Reference.com
Don't let the facts hit you in the bum on the way out the door.
I looked up the 40 yard dash times for our quarterbacks. Worley, Peterman, and Ferguson all at 4.8. Dobbs is either a 4.7 or a 4.94 , depending on which you believe. I couldn't find one listed for High. Apparently, speed is not going to be a factor in choosing a qb. Some may be more elusive or more durable running, but none are that fast.
You watch him run on his tape and their ain't no way he runs a 4.9. Very likely 4.6. I don't see any time listed on Rivals or Scout.Wow. I thought I remembered reading dobbs had like 4.5ish speed. Damn. We got no runners it appears
CBSSPORTS.com has him at 4.7. NCSASPORTS.com has 4.7. ESPNGO.com has Dobbs listed at 4.94. I didn't make it up.You watch him run on his tape and their ain't no way he runs a 4.9. Very likely 4.6. I don't see any time listed on Rivals or Scout.
A quick learner who claims he mastered his high school's offensive system in a day, Dobbs is a natural fit in a spread offensive style. It's been eight seasons (Brent Schaeffer in 2004) since Tennessee used a dual-threat quarterback. Dobbs, who said his best time he ran in the 40-yard dash was 4.6 seconds, has that added dimension recent Tennessee quarterbacks have lacked.
Dobbs brilliant coup for Vols
FWIW, Colin Klein, who was a Heisman candidate last year, for KSU... ran a similar offense to Butch's as a dual threat and he ran a 4.7 at the NFL combine. I could hardly believe it, cause he was very effective as a runner.
Paul, I'm beginning to think that ain't gonna happen this year. Dobbs has done well, but hasn't even separated himself from
ferguson yet.
Thoughts on Dobbs getting the nod at QB:
Dobbs Is The Answer For Tennessee