whobethis16
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2010
- Messages
- 6,291
- Likes
- 3,198
The real issue should be why is a player suspended for another game following an ejection for arguing with an umpire? Basketball players aren't suspended for being ejected following two technical fouls. Football players aren't suspended for being ejected following to unsportsmanlike conduct penalties.
That is the part of this I take the most issue with. You aren't necessarily afforded any sort of official warning (Gilbert, apparently was innings earlier, in this case), and then being tossed automatically results in an immediate one-game suspension. That seems excessive.
I swear, you change this to Arkansas and Battles and instead of Tennessee/Gilbert everyone defending this now would be calling be calling him a punk ass who's an embarrassment to the game and deserves everything he gets.
It's not like this rule is foreign to them. They've known their whole lives not act like that towards the ump, and I'm sure they've been or seen someone tossed for it before. It's not a surprise.I wouldn’t. I think the rule as it stands is unfair to everyone, which is why I suggested alternative penalties in my original post. I think baseball needs to take a lesson from other sports, which IMO handle these kinds of situations better.
If Gilbert had been called out rather ejected, that still would have a negative consequence on the outcome of the game. If the “out” call also served as a warning that any future arguments about balls and strikes would lead to immediate ejection, then that probably would put a stop to the arguing. If not, at least they were warned first and also faced a negative consequence.
He said, “That was a terrible F*** call” and when the ump told him to calm down, he said “F** you” followed by a string of other things about not calming down. He had been escalating over a few innings, and was warned between innings to tone it down or get tossed.
It's not like this rule is foreign to them. They've known their whole lives not act like that towards the ump, and I'm sure they've been or seen someone tossed for it before. It's not a surprise.
It 100% is in high school. Now, in high school, it can be deemed after the post-game/ejection report that the violation was only bad enough to be for the remaining of the game, but it absolutely could hold a suspension. That's up to the state, not the umpires.Again, my biggest problem with this is not the ejection, it’s the suspension. As far as I’m aware, an automatic one game suspension is only an NCAA rule. It‘s definitely not a rule in professional baseball, and at least when I was in high school (which has admittedly been a long time) it wasn’t a rule there either. Maybe it’s a rule in the youth summer leagues, I don’t know.
Uhhh...that's a little disingenuous. His first comment came as he immediately turned in the box to face the ump and unleash his first expletive. His second came with his eyes locked on the umpire despite stepping away. The third came with his back to him, sure, but the tone was already set and the damage was done with his first two comments.Herein lies the problem - Drew was walking the other direction when he said whatever he said. It was a horrendous call - the pitch was both inside and low, and someone somewhere needs to let the ump know that. Next Umpires always feel or take the position - "they are trying to show me up" - my poor delicate ego can't take that. I am going to show everyone how tough I am and who is in charge and kick someone or everyone out of the game. Put a bully in that position and they claim people are trying to show them up - not "let me think through my decision making on my strike zone. "
Turns out Drew was right - we were not getting the corners when we were in the field and ND was the beneficiary of a greatly extended strike zone. Once the ejections happened - all 3 umpires appeared to have a bias against our team and coach and it showed. From checked swings to called strikes and balls. I felt it was a wildly one sided effort by the home plate umpire.
Notre Dame did a great job scouting our pitcher and practicing against his strengths, but the umpires seemed predisposed to keep Tony and Tennessee in check and not be "shown up". Unfortunately, umpires have the power to help or harm - and even major league games can swing on the whims of the ump calling balls and strikes.
Uhhh...that's a little disingenuous. His first comment came as he immediately turned in the box to face the ump and unleash his first expletive. His second came with his eyes locked on the umpire despite stepping away. The third came with his back to him, sure, but the tone was already set and the damage was done with his first two comments.
If that's what he said then he'd get tossed in any sport.He said, “That was a terrible F*** call” and when the ump told him to calm down, he said “F** you” followed by a string of other things about not calming down. He had been escalating over a few innings, and was warned between innings to tone it down or get tossed.
Baseball has many old and sometimes archaic rules. Like getting an inside pitch if you stop too long to watch a home run or take too long running the bases after the home run.
Or players who are friends grabbing each other and kind of dancing instead of actually fighting in some of these bench clearing brawls.
It’s a game of tradition as much as anything and one of those rules is you don’t argue balls and strikes.
As said earlier it is one thing to say something walking away and not starring the umpire down, but it is the next level to stare them down and cuss them.
I love the passion, but to be honest I’ve seen several examples of these arguments where I have been surprised that they weren’t ejected.