volfannbama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 16,406
- Likes
- 20,215
Tomatoes, potatoes.
I stand by me calling it negative when poster pick losses in February for games scheduled in the fall.
I routinely break the schedule down as either gimmie or toss ups.
I define a gimmie game when the program is typically inferior to our expected performance and a loss would be unacceptable.
As for toss up games it's referring to the programs that have a history of success year in and year out.
SEC toss ups are typically bama, Auburn, Fl, Ga,LSU, the rest are expected wins(gimmies). Even if the gimmies are having good years, I still expect the win.
I'm petty, so I never count a game as an expected loss. Even during the game until it gets out of hand(two or more onside kicks or quick turnovers are needed) I'm counting possessions and waiting for another clutch 4th qtr performance leading the Vols to victory.
I've got no issue with identifying areas of improvement from the past. There are ways to present those opportunities without bashing the team and there are ways to express them in negative and destructive ways.
Some handle disappointment better that others. I say set expectations sky high and if we don't meet them, well then just be grown up enough to handle the let down in an adult manner.
Seems some on here will "pump the breaks" so if a loss occurs the blow has been softened. I don't think it really helps. We are all sad after a loss.
Anytime there is a negative prediction about 2017, why not call it negative? Sure it's fine to say 120 had too many turnovers, it's negative to say 121 will be just as bad because CBJ is still the HC. It would be delusional to say "I expect 121 to have zero turnovers". But realistic to expect fewer just because 120 had so many. Same goes for injuries and penalties.
Go ahead and admit that you are the guy that called Eric Ainge and said he wasnt a VFL because he was picking the basketvols to lose two games the rest of the season?