Why, Rick Barnes?

[VolCalls]

AI said 6 out of 10.
2014 wouldn't actually be counted is why.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
is 10 Championships

There was no champion in 2020.

#1 seeds won in 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24.

Never trust AI.

 

[kckempf]

There was no champion in 2020.

#1 seeds won in 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24.

Never trust AI.

Definitely don't trust an LLM to count, they are absolute trash at it.

You'd be surprised at how little LLMs know about anything before you tell them.

 

[Anti-shunshinepumper]

There was no champion in 2020.

#1 seeds won in 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24.

Never trust AI.

meh.....A computer/AI is always only as good has the person programming it/ asking the question. So really it was my misunderstanding in regards.

I was just really guessing as why the difference to what you had, but I was also going off the specific question I typed into AI.
The difference was probably in the way I phrased the question.
I can't remember exactly the question I typed/ asked, but it must have been something to where AI took it as #1 seed more often than # 2 seed in last 10 years.
#2 seed had 1 win so you have 7-1, or a difference of 6 ( i.e 6 more wins out of the 10).

Incidentally, when you start looking back the last 35 years to 1990, it makes the fact we didn't get that #1 seed suck even more.
#1 Seeds have won it 24 times ( almost 70% ),
and the ole # 2 seeds just 4 times (11 %).
That's even worse than I originally thought.


I really don't like the fact we lost that Ole Miss game.

 

[Anti-shunshinepumper]

meh.....A computer/AI is always only as good has the person programming it/ asking the question. So really it was my misunderstanding in regards.

I was just really guessing as why the difference to what you had, but I was also going off the specific question I typed into AI.
The difference was probably in the way I phrased the question.
I can't remember exactly the question I typed/ asked, but it must have been something to where AI took it as #1 seed more often than # 2 seed in last 10 years.
#2 seed had 1 win so you have 7-1, or a difference of 6 ( i.e 6 more wins out of the 10).

Incidentally, when you start looking back the last 35 years to 1990, it makes the fact we didn't get that #1 seed suck even more.
#1 Seeds have won it 24 times ( almost 70% ),
and the ole # 2 seeds just 4 times (11 %).
That's even worse than I originally thought.


I really don't like the fact we lost that Ole Miss game.

I will say for anyone wanting to look on the bright side that out of the last 35 Championships the non-#1 seed has managed to win 11 times.
Out of those 11 times, 4 times it was a #2 seed that ended up winning the Natty.

So the bright side is that if a #1 seed doesn't happen to win this year, we have ~ 37% chance of winning a Natty.

Ha....not great all things considered, but better than a #3 seed at 27% and a # 4 seed at 18%.

A whole he// of a lot better than all the other seeds, because besides a #7 seed one time in 2014, no other seed has won outside a 1-4 seed in 35 years. All other seeds are sitting at 0% odds!