"Wikileaks" to unveil it's "biggest leak yet"

#51
#51
Volunteer_Kirby said:
Yes, right. Those children were definitely packin'.
Click to expand...

The children weren't seen until we had boots on the ground. As someone mentioned earlier there was much more to that video than was released by Wiki.

As for firing on the van perhaps it was a bad move, the perceived threat had been neutralized at that point. I certainly didn't see anything criminal in Wiki's video but it wasn't for lack of trying to portray it that way.
 
#52
#52
volinbham said:
Embarrassing no doubt but probably on par with secondary NCAA violations.

I'm betting there are weeks of this type story. It will mess with international relations, the U.S. will look bad, maybe some diplomats get arrested for "spying" and that will be the extent of it. Oh, and intelligence gathering will be set back. A leaker or two will be caught and jailed. Well done Mssr. Assange.
Click to expand...
Assange is only concerned with the truth, and forced sex. Otherwise, no agenda.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#53
#53
KB5252 said:
The children weren't seen until we had boots on the ground. As someone mentioned earlier there was much more to that video than was released by Wiki.

As for firing on the van perhaps it was a bad move, the perceived threat had been neutralized at that point. I certainly didn't see anything criminal in Wiki's video but it wasn't for lack of trying to portray it that way.
Click to expand...

The gunning down of the van with the children inside was enough for me! Just sayin'!
 
#57
#57
KB5252 said:
It was enough for you to label it criminal?
Click to expand...
Who am I to label something criminal? I could say it was criminal but that wouldn't hold any merit. It seemed to me as though there were unwarranted deaths. I think, if anything, the gunner was a bit too trigger happy. So because of that innocent lives were taken. Criminal? You tell me.
 
#58
#58
Volunteer_Kirby said:
Who am I to label something criminal? I could say it was criminal but that wouldn't hold any merit. It seemed to me as though there were unwarranted deaths. I think, if anything, the gunner was a bit too trigger happy. So because of that innocent lives were taken. Criminal? You tell me.
Click to expand...

You specifically stated that gunning down a vehicle was enough for you but didn't say what it was enough for.
 
#59
#59
Volunteer_Kirby said:
Who am I to label something criminal? I could say it was criminal but that wouldn't hold any merit. It seemed to me as though there were unwarranted deaths. I think, if anything, the gunner was a bit too trigger happy. So because of that innocent lives were taken. Criminal? You tell me.
Click to expand...

Thank God, you weren't around for WWII.
 
#60
#60
Awesome, this crap is already causing me more work. DOD has instituted additional training for the handling of classified/secret material. Get to sit in a day long training class :) Thanks Wikileaks
 
#62
#62
KB5252 said:
You specifically stated that gunning down a vehicle was enough for you but didn't say what it was enough for.
Click to expand...

Picky, are we! Haha. It would make it more fun to just leave this unanswered and let you assume the worst. It was enough for him. Hmph! What could that possibly mean? Perhaps all I meant was that I had seen enough, as in did not wish to see anymore. But hey, if you want assume away and make something of nothing then be my guest! :)
 
#63
#63
MontereyVol said:
Thank God, you weren't around for WWII.
Click to expand...

Dear God what does this even mean? :lolabove:

It's like saying to you thank God you weren't around for the Crusades cause, boy, you growing up in this age has made you softer than a baby's bottom! Back in those days murder, rape, and pillage was an everday thing. But thanks for that, MV. I always appreciate a good laugh.:hi:
 
#65
#65
Volunteer_Kirby said:
Picky, are we! Haha. It would make it more fun to just leave this unanswered and let you assume the worst. It was enough for him. Hmph! What could that possibly mean? Perhaps all I meant was that I had seen enough, as in did not wish to see anymore. But hey, if you want assume away and make something of nothing then be my guest! :)
Click to expand...

In the grand scheme of things, and in particular during times of war it seems to me that you are the one trying to make something out of nothing.

Were the casualties inflicted on the children unfortunate? Absolutely. Do things like this happen every day in war zones? Absolutely.
 
#66
#66
KB5252 said:
In the grand scheme of things, and in particular during times of war it seems to me that you are the one trying to make something out of nothing.

Were the casualties inflicted on the children unfortunate? Absolutely. Do things like this happen every day in war zones? Absolutely.
Click to expand...

So it is. We both seem content with our view on things. Good day to you, KB!
 
#67
#67
Volunteer_Kirby said:
So it is. We both seem content with our view on things. Good day to you, KB!
Click to expand...

Yes I am secure in my beliefs though it's very obvious you are not. You used the word "murder" in your description of the attack which killed civilians yet when I pressed you you side stepped the question and danced around it. Murder is obviously a criminal offense yet when challenged you are afraid to call it as much. Your beliefs are your beliefs and that's fine, just have the balls to say what you truly mean, unless you don't really believe it and are just sensationalizing much like this Assange fellow.
 
#68
#68
KB5252 said:
Yes I am secure in my beliefs though it's very obvious you are not. You used the word "murder" in your description of the attack which killed civilians yet when I pressed you you side stepped the question and danced around it. Murder is obviously a criminal offense yet when challenged you are afraid to call it as much. Your beliefs are your beliefs and that's fine, just have the balls to say what you truly mean, unless you don't really believe it and are just sensationalizing much like this Assange fellow.
Click to expand...

Alright, here we go again! I will state this as simply as I can to avoid confusion.

Murder has, by definition, several different meanings. The one you are referring to is associated with law. Hence (I assume) the reason you asked if I thought it was criminal. Now you speak of a criminal offense. For one, I did not answer wether or not I thought it was criminal because it was not my intention to cross that line. Important distinction! There are other definitions of the word not associated with that of law and we need not anymore confusion ; look them up if you need to.

Now let's not take this any further out of perspective than it need be. Already you have taken it far enough. People can agree to disagree. I tried to establish that with the statement "so it is". But to no avail. You took it a step further and quite obviously threw out a punch or two. Hard to hold a compromise, let alone a serious conversation with someone with that going on! So, now a question for you; does a misunderstanding or an indifference in an outlook merit the insult of someone's character?\

Again, I say; good day to you, sir. :hi:

PS. remember it's just a loving internet forum. :eek:lol:
 
#69
#69
taliburned.jpg
 
#70
#70
Volunteer_Kirby said:
Lives are at risk with these leaks. Haven't you heard? :)
Click to expand...

I think Hillary Clinton made a compelling argument today why lives are at risk.

For what? Basically diplomatic gossip? What interests does this release serve other than the ego/agenda of Assange?

WikiLeaks is the Entertainment Tonight or US Weekly of international relations.
 
#71
#71
Volunteer_Kirby said:
Dear God what does this even mean? :lolabove:

It's like saying to you thank God you weren't around for the Crusades cause, boy, you growing up in this age has made you softer than a baby's bottom! Back in those days murder, rape, and pillage was an everday thing. But thanks for that, MV. I always appreciate a good laugh.:hi:
Click to expand...

Sorry did not realize you were 12 years old, carry on.
 
#72
#72
I remember the good ol' days when VK was little more than another 9-11 Truther, then he joined the Air Force...

the more things change, the more they stay the same
 
#75
#75
KB5252 said:
Yes I am secure in my beliefs though it's very obvious you are not. You used the word "murder" in your description of the attack which killed civilians yet when I pressed you you side stepped the question and danced around it. Murder is obviously a criminal offense yet when challenged you are afraid to call it as much. Your beliefs are your beliefs and that's fine, just have the balls to say what you truly mean, unless you don't really believe it and are just sensationalizing much like this Assange fellow.
Click to expand...

Talk about side stepping. You call this guy out and you complete avoid answering my question and use the excuse of being earnest. Talk about gutless.

Anyways, and please don't side step this, do you think it was murder when we dropped the two bombs on Japan?

Do you think Tibbets should have been tried for murder?
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top