"Wikileaks" to unveil it's "biggest leak yet"

You don't get it??

You do get the eye shadow and lipstick?

I figure you post those types images because you are a closet racist. The only time I see flies crawling over a black person's face is when one of those Feed the Children commercials is on TV. The pathetic nature of malnourished African children too weak to brush away flies probably gives you a feeling of cultural superiority. You see Obama as one of those kids and you're terrified that someone you have so much contempt for is the President of the United States.
 
I figure you post those types images because you are a closet racist. The only time I see flies crawling over a black person's face is when one of those Feed the Children commercials is on TV. The pathetic nature of malnourished African children too weak to brush away flies probably gives you a feeling of cultural superiority. You see Obama as one of those kids and you're terrified that someone you have so much contempt for is the President of the United States.


Well no actually the reason is that I am anti-communist.

BTW most of those malnourished African children you saw on TV was when the southern Christian Nigerian minority seceded from the country and the moslem masters starved them into submission.

Check your history books.

MG1968 you are too FOS with which to have any intelligent conversation.

Take your personal slurs and stuff them up your ass from whence they came!

Change a spark plug, that is about the apex of your intellectual capacity.

171296.jpg


If you don't count Carter.

CarterSmile.jpg
 
Assange is now criticizing the media for leaking details of his private life.

oh, the irony

Assange’s lawyer wants investigation of leaks (about Assange) - Yahoo! News

Careful what you ask for, you just might get it. Hilarious.
This is the problem with anarchists. They are all for doing whatever they want as it relates to infringing on OTHERS' rights. BUT, when it comes to someone else's actions infringing on them, they get all pissy and moany.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Last edited:
What Does Wikileaks Have on Bank of America? | Economy | AlterNet

Recent new reports suggest that BofA is now moving into high gear on damage control, creating a "war room" and buying up hundreds of derogatory Internet domain names including BankofAmericaSucks.com and BrianMoynihanblows.com (BofA's CEO).

Seems as though WikiLeaks has some good info on BoA and it's CEO.



On another note, a US prosecution of Julian Assange will have no effect on how WikiLeaks operates now or in the future, considering he's just the PR guy and 1 of 100 people working for WikiLeaks.
 
Risk of an Obama Hiroshima apology --Arthur Herman - NYPOST.com

A stunning revelation from a Wikileaks document dump shows President Obama badly bungling relations with our oldest democratic ally in Asia.

In a September 2009 cable prior to Obama’s official visit to Tokyo, our ambassador informs Washington that Tokyo had denied Obama’s bid to go to Hiroshima to publicly apologize for America’s dropping the atom bomb there -- in short, to turn the defeat of Japan into a matter of national humiliation for America.

The Japanese government told the ambassador this would be a “non-starter,” because the gesture would encourage domestic anti-nuclear groups and leftist groups opposed to Japan’s military cooperation with the United States.

Future Japanese governments would have little choice except to join the region’s burgeoning arms race -- and at least one former Japanese defense official has said the end of the US alliance would probably force Japan to build its own nuclear arsenal.

How ironic, if Obama’s attempt to commemorate the Japanese victims of a nuclear bomb had ultimately led that same country to get nuclear weapons themselves.
 
Careful what you ask for, you just might get it. Hilarious.
This is the problem with anarchists. They are all for doing whatever they want as it relates to infringing on OTHERS' rights. BUT, when it comes to someone else's actions infringing on them, they get all pissy and moany.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Why do you think Assange is an anarchist?
 
I would absolutely love it if one of the resident lefties on this board could possibly defend an unwelcomed attempt to apologize for Hiroshima by Obama.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Wait, he wanted to apologize for ending a war saving millions of lives? The event that single handily established AMERICA as the world superpower.
 
I would absolutely love it if one of the resident lefties on this board could possibly defend an unwelcomed attempt to apologize for Hiroshima by Obama.


I'm sure there would have been no greater context to it. He would have just said "Our bad" and left. No commentary about the strong alliance. No comment about how the world has changed for all of us. No anti-proliferation commentary.

No, he'd have just said it was our fault and left.

:eek:k:
 
I'm sure there would have been no greater context to it. He would have just said "Our bad" and left. No commentary about the strong alliance. No comment about how the world has changed for all of us. No anti-proliferation commentary.

No, he'd have just said it was our fault and left.

:eek:k:

So you're saying he couldn't have had that conversation without apologizing for dropping the bomb?

If that was the context, why wouldn't Japan have told him let's have the public discourse, but don't do the apology? They simply told him "the apology is a bad idea" and then they never had any of the discourse you've suggested might have been the underlying context.
 
So you're saying he couldn't have had that conversation without apologizing for dropping the bomb?

If that was the context, why wouldn't Japan have told him let's have the public discourse, but don't do the apology? They simply told him "the apology is a bad idea" and then they never had any of the discourse you've suggested might have been the underlying context.


I'm not privy to all of it, but your knee jerk hatred of Obama has you assuming a whole lot and just blasting him based on your assumptions. I am sure there is much more to the story than you'd like, because it does not fit your agenda for there to be more to it than simply whether to give an apology.


It is simpletons like you (and I'm being pretty generous with that term here) that give conservatives a bad name. Your auto-pilot response to anything Obama does is disingenuous and superficial.

It prevents real discourse.
 
LG, I won't get into the namecalling with you.

Let me ask this: Even if the apology was a part of a greater context such as the one you presented, would it have been a good idea? Even within your hypothetical scenario, it still seems like a horrible idea (and the Japanese apparently thought so, too).

And as much as I may have a knee-jerk reaction to Obama's foolishness, it appears that you have the same reaction in reverse: "Surely there must be some greater context, because Obama can't possibly be that foolish."
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top