Just some visitors thoughts - Hart really did not have much choice in hiring Holly. Holly was hired as Pat's choice and out of respect for Pat (as it should have been.) Any other hire would at the time have been pretty unthinkable. And the job she was handed was very tough - that transition year was impossible, and the next few years were going to be a constant comparison to a living legend, and not the previous few years that were not great but to the Parker years and the even more impressive 'Meke' years of the late 1990s.
For the purpose of that transition, Holly has done well - the recruiting is still solid and the teams have won the SEC and maintained top 10 rankings. Is she the answer long term? Honestly, I don't think so. I have no idea what her practices are like or how she works the team and the dynamic between coaching staff and players, but her press conferences and the way the team actually plays, and her substitution patterns ... they leave something to be desired. We fans talk about players having a 'high basketball IQ' but seldom if ever use those terms with coaches, but I think that is what I would use to critique Holly ... she does not have a high basketball IQ. She recognizes when things look right and when they look wrong, but she doesn't know either how to get from wrong to right or how to coach the practices to get 'right' more often than 'wrong' on the court.
So ... I do think TN needs to be looking for a new coach, and they do not need someone that has 'Pat's bloodlines' but rather someone with a proven track record as a head coach with high WBB IQ. While I understand the emotional appeal of Tyler, either 'waiting for him' or hiring him now would be a big mistake. Holly has provided a transition period and the next coach should provide a new beginning, not another homage to Pat.
(As a Uconn fan, I dread the transition that will be coming in a few years and we have the same mixture of sentimental desire for a Geno 'bloodline' replacement vs. just a really good high IQ coach.)