Woman Has 15 Abortions In 17 Years

#127
#127
volfanjustin said:
My god, you liberals are something else.

The baby is his just as much as its the mothers. Why does he not have any say if his child is murdered in cold blood?
Click to expand...
Again, you're lost on my political bent. Read up troop.

The baby is his when it's a baby or viable fetus, but until that point, the mother is the one having to support the baby.
 
#132
#132
KB5252 said:
If he was carrying the unborn child his decision would be the deciding factor.

What about grandparents rights? What if they wanted to raise the child and agreed to do so without help from the mother or father?

That argument is circular, the issue at hand must be debated, that issue is a woman's right's under the law as it pertains to her pregnancy and body.
Click to expand...

What law? Show me this law as stated in our constitution.
 
#134
#134
BigPapaVol said:
because one is alive and clearly warranted the rights provided by our constitution. For one, that is definitely up for debate. Until someone can provide sufficient evidence of survivability without the mother, seems to me the mother has right to decide how to handle her body.
Click to expand...

the problem is modern medicine is quickly narrowing the gap between survivability and the latest you can legally get an abortion.
 
#142
#142
as for the father i think it's kind of ridiculous that a women has the right to abort your child and also the right to have the child and milk you for 18 years of child support even if you didn't want either outcome. i know many a guy whose gf got "accidently" pregnant and miraculously she became a devout christian who was against abortion.
 
#143
#143
utvolpj said:
yes if you were shown to be the reason it died. You have no control over her body
Click to expand...

What if I'm outside an abortion clinic the mother is walking into to have an abortion and I'm practicing roundhouse kicks and she walks in front of me and I kick her?
 
#144
#144
BigPapaVol said:
because one is alive and clearly warranted the rights provided by our constitution. For one, that is definitely up for debate. Until someone can provide sufficient evidence of survivability without the mother, seems to me the mother has right to decide how to handle her body.
Click to expand...

BigPapaVol said:
one set of them is still getting all sustenance from mommy's blood and can't live apart from it.
Click to expand...

So why is it that a "life" dependent on another life for sustenance can be aborted without issue or delay as decided at the federal level, but a "life" dependent on a machine for sustenance required 7 years of debate (e.g. Terri Schiavo) and was ultimately decided by the state?
 
#145
#145
JZVOL said:
What if I'm outside an abortion clinic the mother is walking into to have an abortion and I'm practicing roundhouse kicks and she walks in front of me and I kick her?
Click to expand...

seriously?

rkd2.jpg
 
#146
#146
volfanjustin said:
You sir don't have a clue.

Answer my question since you have all of the answers
Click to expand...

First, example of you being wrong: the political leanings of certain posters you called out specifically.

Your question has already been answered by another post, the father does not have the same rights to the child as the mother until it is born. The mother carries the child and is the sole provider for that child until born. There is no arguing that point it is fact.
 
#149
#149
volfanjustin said:
But I thought it was not a person until it entered the world and took a breath outside its mother?
Click to expand...

the issue is who has control over it. You decided you wanted to exercise control over something you have no business messing with. The rights of the mother and some random person are completely different.

GASOUTHERNVOL said:
what is he to be charged with?
Click to expand...

how would I know? Ask lawgator. Assault at a minimum (too bad stupidity isn't a crime too)
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top