fade route
Just being honest
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Messages
- 17,397
- Likes
- 16,185
Coach Jake said they got that number down into the twenties yesterday. As for Worley under throwing guys, I have only seen one horrible under throw in the video's I've seen. They were running post routes and he was throwing to Malone. Since they were making a big deal about throwing to a spot, and with Coach Z yelling the whole time, "flatten out, flatten out," I think Worley threw to the spot and Malone wasn't where he was supposed to be.
I'm not a football expert by any means, but that's just what I saw.
I'm not sure what motivation Ainge and Swain would have to say this if it wasn't true. I mean, QB controversies make for good sports talk radio, so it seems they might have more motivation to say the opposite. So I'll put some stock in it.
Don't just look for him hitting guys in stride... look for ball placement.
Hitting a guy on a post route at his torso might be a completion in practice but an INT against Florida, Bama, USC, Georgia, etc.
That's interesting because Hyams was on 104.5 this morning talking about how the coaches stated they were not terribly happy with the QB situation at the moment. Said there were 62 passes thrown off mark in their first practice - compared to 63 in last year's first practice. According to Bajakian, good football teams have 15-25 misses in a practice.
According to some, Worley has increased his throwing power this off season. While that may be true, after watching some of the practice videos, he still under throws the receivers on 40 yard passes. Maybe it's an accuracy issue, but he looks very accurate in 10-20 yard throws.
According to Coach Z there were 62 the first practice, high 40's the second and mid 40's the third.
Keep lowering the numbers of balls on the ground each practice and by game day it's going to be on.
According to some, Worley has increased his throwing power this off season. While that may be true, after watching some of the practice videos, he still under throws the receivers on 40 yard passes. Maybe it's an accuracy issue, but he looks very accurate in 10-20 yard throws.
What is the crap to you? That Worley looks better?
Also something that some may not be considering is that these are drills without coverage that Jones allows the media to see and film. Throwing to receivers without coverage is somewhat similar to pitching without a batter... sometimes having something to miss is just as beneficial as having something to hit.
Also something that some may not be considering is that these are drills without coverage that Jones allows the media to see and film. Throwing to receivers without coverage is somewhat similar to pitching without a batter... sometimes having something to miss is just as beneficial as having something to hit.
doesn't matter who looks better. these same guys told you all that ferguson was the 2nd coming of Peyton before the spring game and we saw how big of a lie that was. now here they go again. all they do is get ratings by going with what seems popular. if the coaches aren't saying it, it's hogwash
I didn't see them quite do that. I saw one or both say that he was the most physically gifted of UT's QB's and that if he became consistent the job would be his. The did rave over his arm strength... but apparently RF has that in abundance.
The whole episode with RF though is a stark difference between the previous 3 staffs and this one. Dooley would have bungled it altogether. Kiffin and Fulmer would have likely fed his prima donna attitude to keep his physical talent. Jones held him accountable to the same standard as everyone else even to the point of losing him.
Succeed or fail, Jones deserves great credit for being clear with expectations and then holding everyone to the same ones.
doesn't matter who looks better. these same guys told you all that ferguson was the 2nd coming of Peyton before the spring game and we saw how big of a lie that was. now here they go again. all they do is get ratings by going with what seems popular. if the coaches aren't saying it, it's hogwash