Can we just merge this crap with your "I'm taking my ball & going home" thread? They both offer about the same amount of truth & waist equal amounts of cyberspace.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
![Eek! :eek: :eek:]()
lol:
to imply the bible and christianity has the same level as acceptance of violence as the koran and the muslim religion is basically showing you haven't studied either. let's not forget mohammad was a military leader. and btw i'm an agnostic.
Astute observation.
We are used to it.
Christianity does not teach and preach mass murder and terror. Islam wants those who do not believe like they do to be murdered. Islam is not about peace or tolerance. A "good" muslim commits mass murder and/or accepts when other muslims do they same.
Exactly, hard to understand how some numbskull can't seem to grasp that.
I'm curious as to what ya'll see as the difference between current day Islamic extremists and the Crusaders of the middle ages?
That has to be the dullest and crookedest arrow in the liberal quiver and hardly deserves an answer, especially to someone who lives inthe same neighborhood mentally as ACLG but I'll give it the old college try once again.
You must have a modicum of knowledge of history to understand the reasons for the cusades.
The muslims took a couple million Europeans back to the near east to be sold as slaves in the numerous slave markets and were more highly valued than the tens of millions of black African slaves. You ask why aren't there many black Africans in the middle east as you find in places like Haiti and Brazil? It is because the males were castrated and the children of female concubines were killed as soon as they were born.
Much has been made of events during the second or third crusade when crusaders were said to have gone beserk. One of the reasons for that was that they found so many fellow Europeans who had been castrated and their tongues cut out to make the docile and uncomplaining.
The main reason for the crusades was to relieve oppression in the Holy land by muslim conquerers. After sweeping out of the Arabian penensula into the lower Tigris, Euphrates valleys and killing or converting the mostly Christian population and tearing down as remnants of evidence on any Christian past, (as they are presently doing in Kosovo, Samarkland and other places with Christian heritages) thye swept accross Persia and conquered the people of the Indus valley.
The muslim armies had the advantage of fanaticism, greed, (for they all shared in captured goods), and fine horses which often gave them the element of surprise.
They advanced into the Iberian penensula, asia minor, the balkans and eastern Europe, conquering everything in their path. They conquered and occupied Sicily and even extracted tribute from the Vatican in Rome, they attacked by sea many of the Italian coastal cities to exact the dhimmi tribute from so-called infidels, when on township refused to pay, the followers of the religion of peace gathered 20,000 peasants and beheaded them before the gates of the town and warned them to have the tribute ready to pay next year or they would lay siege. Those areas, particularly Venice and Rome called for help from thier neighbors to the north.
Essentially the crusades was a defensive maneuver to liberate and protect the Christians and Christian heritage in Jerusalam the holy city and it's surrounds.
There were other reasons as well, such as piracy, high amounts of tariffs charged for commerce of goods passing through lands or seas controled by islam.
Either you have a high degree of ignorance of history or you just havn't thought out much about your curiosity.
By the way you seem to think one would think you equate the American invasion and occupation of Germany with the nazi invasion of Poland or that America was unjustified in it's war against Japan after Pearl Harbor.