I wish everyone could play a "bit" and have those stat lines!Yeah - he played a "bit" against South Carolina . . . 9 catches for 81 yards and 2 TDs.
I understood the point, but it's wrong. If the MS couple opens a small business risking all their life savings of $50K, and the CT couple opens a business with life savings of $250K, who's risking more? If Hyatt is a 2nd-3rd rounder and Young a high 1st-round, they're both risking their entire stake. Risk is relative.
My only argument in this whole thing has been and will continue to be is that you have different standards between Tillman and Hyatt. I understand why they are sitting out and I am not pissed off about it. Can't critique one without the other though, Tillman is able to play but wont risk his future. Same as Hyatt.And we got destroyed.... While losing our qb. What happen to mizzou and vandy ? He didnt want to play. Simple as that. He warmed up and went full go before the game. What say you chief ? I was there.
Not sure what that has to do with what we are talking about? Hooker got hurt running option and the defense gave up 63. Neither of which had anything to do with Tillman - who was catching 8 passes and 2 TDs.And we got destroyed.... While losing our qb.
He had a tight rope procedure that is a 3-5 week recovery. Most professional guys are playing in week 3 or 4 with it based on what I have read. That all said its been a month since he played a game and another week until the orange bowl. You don't think in 5 weeks he "could" play effectively ? Yet you are all over Hyatt because he doesn't think it's in his best interest to play in the Orange Bowl. He has a whole lot of film and will likely be taken in the 1st rd after dropping a low 4.3 or possibly even a sub 4.3 at worst he likely slips into a 2nd round pick. He will not improve his stock by playing but could lose a lot. Tillman could be the opposite based on his lack of playing time.Not sure what that has to do with what we are talking about? Hooker got hurt running option and the defense gave up 63. Neither of which had anything to do with Tillman - who was catching 8 passes and 2 TDs.
I'm just saying I don't think you can call what Tillman did after his injury "quitting". The guy had ankle surgery in late September, yet came back to catch 20 more balls in the final month of the season. He didn't play against Mizzou because he warmed up and they didn't like him on a wet field. He was out for the Vandy game because he got dinged against South Carolina when he got pulled down from behind.
Where is this coming from?? I havenāt posted anything critical of Hyatt. Iām completely fine with him opting out if thatās what he thinks is best for him.He had a tight rope procedure that is a 3-5 week recovery. Most professional guys are playing in week 3 or 4 with it based on what I have read. That all said its been a month since he played a game and another week until the orange bowl. You don't think in 5 weeks he "could" play effectively ? Yet you are all over Hyatt because he doesn't think it's in his best interest to play in the Orange Bowl. He has a whole lot of film and will likely be taken in the 1st rd after dropping a low 4.3 or possibly even a sub 4.3 at worst he likely slips into a 2nd round pick. He will not improve his stock by playing but could lose a lot. Tillman could be the opposite based on his lack of playing time.
Sorry I was referring to the general argument in which my original post was directed. I just took it as you agreed with many others that Hyatt should play because he owed it to the University. My apologiesWhere is this coming from?? I havenāt posted anything critical of Hyatt. Iām completely fine with him opting out if thatās what he thinks is best for him.
Your exactly correct. My contention was that if merely looking at total potential rookie deals in terms of dollars those two were taking an even higher risk. Doesn't change the fact that playing in any one game does not lessen or raise your risk of injury
But you are not an nfl GM and this is a business Jalin put everything he needed to on film and now itās time for the backups to step up and show why they came to UTā¦ we still have plenty of good players and this is their opportunity to step up and show they can contribute now and next yearā¦ itās a big game but in the grand scheme winning or losing this game does not affect the trajectory of our programā¦ easy for you to sit here and criticize opt outs but if you were 22 and somebody told you that you could lose millions by playing in this bowl game then from a business standpoint it would make no sense to playā¦ would I like to see hooker and ced and Jalin play absolutely but I wonāt feel any different about them because they chose to opt out a bowl gameā¦ Iām actually excited to see who steps up for us and what the team could potentially look like next year .All I gotta say is that if I was an NFL GM it would matter to me. I think it says something about the player's view of the ole TEAM-me dynamic. That's always been my opinion and I'm not changing because it's one of our guys sitting out. IDGAF what anybody says this is a huge game for this program. We have not been to one of the original major bowls in 20+ years. That means alot to this fanbase and it should mean alot to this team, especially it's ostensible leaders. I bet Hendon Hooker would be playing if he was healthy.
I imagine that view will be a tad less popular if we end this reinvigorating season by getting our poop pushed in New Year's Eve because our best players weren't on the field.But you are not an nfl GM and this is a business Jalin put everything he needed to on film and now itās time for the backups to step up and show why they came to UTā¦ we still have plenty of good players and this is their opportunity to step up and show they can contribute now and next yearā¦ itās a big game but in the grand scheme winning or losing this game does not affect the trajectory of our programā¦ easy for you to sit here and criticize opt outs but if you were 22 and somebody told you that you could lose millions by playing in this bowl game then from a business standpoint it would make no sense to playā¦ would I like to see hooker and ced and Jalin play absolutely but I wonāt feel any different about them because they chose to opt out a bowl gameā¦ Iām actually excited to see who steps up for us and what the team could potentially look like next year .
Thatās for dang sure. Iām amazed people have spent weeks arguing about this. At the end of the day, the only opinions that count are the player and his family and thatās it. Anything else is a waste of breath and typing.Plenty of reasons to play. Plenty of reasons to not play . . . but, yeah, the number of tortured takes on this subject is amazing lol.
How do you know āTillman is able to playā? Unless you are the team doctor or Tillman himself, you got nothing but idle speculation from a seat in the stands. I do agree that both are protecting themselves. One from the standpoint of being hobbled most of the season and not want to risk further injury. The other who is healthy and not wanting to risk injury and a drop in the draft. Either way, itās their decision and nobody elseās counts.My only argument in this whole thing has been and will continue to be is that you have different standards between Tillman and Hyatt. I understand why they are sitting out and I am not pissed off about it. Can't critique one without the other though, Tillman is able to play but wont risk his future. Same as Hyatt.
According to that logic, why in the world did he play against Vandy? By that point, all team goals were gone. Makes no sense.You know what these games are discounted from day one. At no point this year, my assumption, did any coach/player say let's win the Orange Bowl. That was never a team goal. The only bowls associated with team goals are the playoffs. And I doubt those are stated team goals. It's win the division and win the conference. So not a goal. It's why, despite what some clown is here think, no player or coach is mad at someone sitting out. To each their own.
Played their butts off to get the the 1st ny6 bowl in ages and... skips the reward. Just odd to me.No disrespect to Jalin; heās cemented his legacy and I wish him the best. That being said I donāt understand the opt out trend. Why is it suddenly acceptable to bail on your teammates during bowl season when it wasnāt acceptable to do so for generations prior?
I think Bryce Young and Will Anderson Jrs pro stock is good regardles. Jalin Hyatt had a phenomenal season but people still question with tough physical corners can he get job done and the questions if Heupel benefited more by Hyatts speed or Hyatt benefited more from Heupels system. His questions make it where if he has a poor game against Clemson like he was underwhelming against South Carolina after physical corner got him flustered and was essentially a non factor. Then of course worse than that the obvious. He gets injured so wont be able to showcase his speed on pro day or combines. Scouts may think if he even loses quarter of a second on his 40 time he will lose his biggest asset and drop. Young and Anderson even if injured are viewed as cant miss prospects so while sure injury can affect their stock. They wont free fall like Hyatt would because of the questions.
I will get killed for this but I do think he could be better prepared if he could have improved the physical part and mental side when things didn't go well he tended to visibly show it bothered him. Again though it is near impossible to best this season. You take first round stock and run with it.In this scenario it would mean that Jalin was not ready. Heath Shuler esque
I will get killed for this but I do think he could be better prepared if he could have improved the physical part and mental side when things didn't go well he tended to visibly show it bothered him. Again though it is near impossible to best this season. You take first round stock and run with it.