Yeah, I'm talking about the Kentucky team that beat LSU that year and almost beat Florida. That Kentucky team.
Look, I don't know how we got off on this. My point, lies within this:
Look at Ainge in Cut's system. The ball was coming out fast and there were hardly any passes downfield due to the lack of a deep threat. Them sytem with Smith, Meachem, and Swain was much better and a lot more explosive. Those guys were above average college receivers.
"Them (which I believe you meant to say the) system with Smith, Meachem, and Swain was much better and a lot more explosive". What you don't realize is that the system that those 3 were explosive in and really excelled in WAS Cut's system, which you tried to accredit Rogers' success with. I wasn't even going to argue with you until you started playing the system card and then spit out that nonsense.