1 Baylor- Art Briles offense, Kendall Briles OC
2 Marshall- Holiday's offense
3 Oregon- Helfrich's offense; Frost isn't moving laterally
4 Western Ky.-Jeff Brohm's offense
5 TCU- Neither OC are moving laterally.
- East Carolina- Lincoln Riley
7 Washington St.- Leach's system
8 Mississippi St.- Mullen's system
9 Ohio St.- Meyer's system
10 Texas Tech- Kingsbury's system
A few interesting points about that poorly formated list though. Most are directly associated with the Leach coaching tree and derivatives of the "Air Raid" offense, Briles, Riley, Kingsbury, Cumbie. Most also have offensive minded head coaches, honestly I have no idea how much implementation of the offense the coordinator actually has, I know Leach calls plays for WSU even though he is HC.
Now you could just simply form a pool of candidates by offensive output at other schools without considering your current players and whether they fit that system or just hire them without considering that maybe they aren't the offensive mastermind behind that system being implemented but I think that there are a lot of considerations other than just statistical offensive output. Give me someone from a similar system that performs well against his best competition instead of some of these that have padded their stats versus inferior competition. I just think that statistical total offense as a guide is extremely myopic in going about evaluating a candidate. JMHO though.
Not sure where your list came from. I'm pulling my stats from ESPN.
1. Oregon - would Frost leave for more money? Does he want to stay at a place where he will never get the majority of credit for the offense?
2. Marshall - OC makes way less than UT is paying. Probably better to have OC of nation's #2 offense than a guy who has been out of football for years or a guy whose offense couldn't crack the top 40.
3. Ohio State - not a viable option
4. Baylor - OC left to become HC. Not a viable option.
5. Western Kentucky - OC makes way less than UT is paying. Probably better to have OC of nation's #5 offense than a guy who has been out of football for years or a guy whose offense couldn't crack the top 40.
6. (tie) East Carolina - OC left. Not a viable option.
6. (tie) TCU - Would Cumbie like to call plays? Would either Meachem or Cumbie like a better title and better pay?
8. Boise State - OC makes way less than UT is paying. Probably better to have OC of nation's #8 offense than a guy who has been out of football for years or a guy whose offense couldn't crack the top 40.
9. Alabama - NOT A VIABLE OPTION.
10. Mississippi State - not a viable option.
There are 5 OCs there that could probably be lured away for the right price. And, at least a few of those probably wouldn't break the bank.
I do agree that fit is very important though.
The weird thing is, back when Butch first started here and the offense really struggled in his first season, every question of whether this offense would work was met with "This offense is just like Oregon/Auburn/Texas A&M/etc....we just need the personnel" responses. Now, everyone is acting like this is the most unique offense of all time and we have to dig through the jungle to find someone capable of running it. It's odd.
If this offense is so unique (or if Butch is so difficult to mesh with) that we have to find guy who is out of football or a guy whose offensive stats aren't very impressive, then one has to wonder if this offense will ever work in this league or improve much from the 83rd in the nation-type results we have seen so far.