Paul Pelosi attacked in home invasion

Cholly Kirk just cannot figure it out. For a long time I thought the word "stupid" was recklessly over-used, but no. We need to use that word accurately, more often, for guys like this.

"Why is the conservative movement to blame...? And why is he still in jail? Why has he not been bailed out? And by the way, if some amazing patriot out there in San Francisco or the Bay Area wants to really be a midterm hero, someone should go and bail this guy out ... bail him out..."

Prominent conservative Charlie Kirk calls on his audience to bail out Pelosi attacker
 
Have I mentioned "Steele dossier?" Yes.

Read what I said in those posts. I don't discuss the specific contents in any detail or advocate for its authenticity as you claim I did. In one post, I clearly say that Clinton as wrong for commissioning it. So pi$$ off.
You jumped into 10 different threads about the topic just on the first page.

Took this snippet - "Both matters, the Steele Dossier and the Trump campaign's association with Russian operatives, merited the scrutiny of a special counsel."

Again your words, not mine. You chose to go all in to Trump and the Steele Dossier over the years and then today claimed you didn't encourage it. Your hypocrisy which is a common theme of the left is why it's confusing to be a Democrat. Always forgetting what they stand for and changing as the clock ticks.
 
I never said that I didn't mention the words "Steele dossier." I never promoted it. In one post, I even say that Hillary Clinton was wrong for commissioning it. Might want to read what I had to say about it. Very little ... and what I did say wasn't in favor of it.

You’re posting about MTG but failing to acknowledge your own party such as Chuck Schumer who put a public hit out Supreme Court Justices. Don’t be a hypocrite.

If those people condoned and/or called for acts of violence, suggested that violence was an acceptable course of action to take in dispute resolution, or as a means to achieving a political objective? Then they were every bit as wrong and irresponsible as Roger Stone was.

See, BB, you’re a raging hypocrite and all these Trumpkins are as consistent as Starbucks coffee.
 
You jumped into 10 different threads about the topic just on the first page.

Took this snippet - "Both matters, the Steele Dossier and the Trump campaign's association with Russian operatives, merited the scrutiny of a special counsel."

Again your words, not mine. You chose to go all in to Trump and the Steele Dossier over the years and then today claimed you didn't encourage it. Your hypocrisy which is a common theme of the left is why it's confusing to be a Democrat. Always forgetting what they stand for and changing as the clock ticks.
I didn't promote the authenticity of the dossier ... I did say that Hillary Clinton was wrong for commissioning it. Of course, you leave that out.
 
That is a lie. I said that I would describe her (Hillary Clinton) commissioning of the Steele dossier as wrong.

That's another lie by you today. Might want to go back and revisit like I said earlier before you backtrack.

Here's post #1 from 2017. Might want to start there and work backwards- "Conservatives are going to lean hard on this "dossier defense". It's really not a defense at all but conservatives are desperate and have nothing else to cling to." - BowlBrother85 I don't see you claiming it was wrong.
 
Last edited:
That's another lie by you today. Might want to go back and revisit like I said earlier before you backtrack.

Here's post #1 from 2017. Might want to start there and work backwards- "Conservatives are going to lean hard on this "dossier defense". It's really not a defense at all but conservatives are desperate and have nothing else to cling to. " I don't see you claiming it was wrong.
Then you are either blind or lying ..

From February 6, 2022 :

"I would describe her(Hillary Clinton) commissioning of the Steele dossier as wrong, but it's not the same thing as what Trump attempted to do."

^^^ That was in reference to Trump's alternate elector scheme to overturn the result of the 2020 Presidential Election. ^^^
 
Then you are either blind or lying ..

From February 6, 2022 :

"I would describe her(Hillary Clinton) commissioning of the Steele dossier as wrong, but it's not the same thing as what Trump attempted to do."

^^^ That was in reference to Trump's alternate elector scheme to overturn the result of the 2020 Presidential Election. ^^^
You mean after the fact. Yeah, gonna have to deny that request. 5 years later showed you bought into it. Like I said, you might want to start with post #1 and even stated you might want to sit this one out well before we get on this topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
I don't think it's a 50:50 thing and I'll explain difference. Although both sides are partisan and against compromise, the left takes it a step further. They call you a bad person, example: deplorable. The right doesn't take it that far. They say we disagree and we'll beat you at the polls
^^^ I just love this post. ^^^

It shows such awareness of who the Republican Party nominated for President in 2016 and 2020.

Insult after insult: All of Trump's ugly campaign rhetoric in one place

A guide to Trump's nicknames and insults about the 2020 Democratic field

No Republican President would ever dream of resorting to personal attacks and name-calling against their critics or opponents, would they? Not a chance. Republicans are above such behavior.
 
You mean after the fact. Yeah, gonna have to deny that request. 5 years later showed you bought into it.
I never promoted it... or said the content of it was authentic. Now, I'm tired of this. Go play gotcha games with someone else.
 
I never promoted it... or said the content of it was authentic. Now, I'm tired of this. Go play gotcha games with someone else.

The Steele dossier has not been discredited at all... to the contrary, 70% of it has been confirmed as accurate. Comey said no such thing in his testimony about the dossier. As for my IQ? I'm not sure. However, I am a proud graduate of the University of Tennessee (class of 1996) and also a VERY STABLE GENIUS. :)

I got more.
 
^^^ I just love this post. ^^^

It shows such awareness of who the Republican Party nominated for President in 2016 and 2020.

Insult after insult: All of Trump's ugly campaign rhetoric in one place

A guide to Trump's nicknames and insults about the 2020 Democratic field

No Republican President would ever dream of resorting to personal attacks and name-calling against their critics or opponents, would they? Not a chance. Republicans are above such behavior.

Trump said:

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best . . . They are sending people that have lots of problems ,” he charged. “They’re bringing drugs . . . crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

What about that statement is untrue? This comes directly from your list. The first one listed
 
Trump said:



What about that statement is untrue? This comes directly from your list. The first one listed
You really going to die on this hill? The right doesn’t name call or characterize people as bad people? And you’re taking Trump under that umbrella?
 
Trump said:



What about that statement is untrue? This comes directly from your list. The first one listed
Like that is the only example that was given in those two links? LOL!

If we can agree on anything concerning Donald Trump at all, it should be that he enjoys insulting his critics and opponents and that he frequently resorts to personal attacks, while doing so. That is what Trump's campaign crowds want him to do ... and he never disappoints them.
 
Gotcha backtracking. Again, thanks for playing. Watch those hypocrisy post while playing saint.
I never said I was perfect ... and I have posted over 30,000 messages here and don't recall all of the very well. Now ... Stop.
 
Nice spin to say I'm inconsistent and influenced by MSM.
I don't spin anything ... and the views I express here are my own, formed from my education and life's experience. I don't need anyone to tell me how to think. For the most, I do try for consistency ... and I'm more critical of Democrats on here ... than what most want to believe.

Now, you are boring. Talk to someone else.
 
You really going to die on this hill? The right doesn’t name call or characterize people as bad people? And you’re taking Trump under that umbrella?
I'm not going to die on any hill. This is his list. I think that particular quote of Trump's is accurate. if he wants to pivot, I'll let him go
 
Like that is the only example that was given in those two links? LOL!

If we can agree on anything concerning Donald Trump at all, it should be that he enjoys insulting his critics and opponents and that he frequently resorts to personal attacks, while doing so. That is what Trump's campaign crowds want him to do ... and he never disappoints them.
The Dims and media darlings throw everything they have at R’s everyday. If a tsunami hit the west coast you guys would find a way to blame Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davethevol
How dare you use someone’s words against them! What kinda Jedi mind ninja, 5D chess tactics are these?
I make mistakes ... and can admit to them. And basically, already had. I clearly did say that Hillary Clinton was wrong for commissioning that dossier. If I had said something which wasn't in harmony with that previously? Then the previous statements were mistaken. I throw myself on the mercy of the Gotcha Games Court.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hog88

VN Store



Back
Top