VolArmy74
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 9,752
- Likes
- 17,291
Neither of those things are what’s being discussed. Aidoo had a good game. He has potential. The thing that I’ve commented on is whether or not to START Uros. Aidoo played 29 minutes. Uros played 12. Why does that trigger anybody? If Aidoo started and picked up 2 quick, cheap fouls he’d have played less than 20 minutes.
What if Aidoo starts, gets two early blocks, 3 rebounds and goes 2 for 2 from the field and we go up 12-2? The whole point that was made that he start was that Uros clearly isn't helping us get started fast, and may in fact be hindering us.
Arguing we shouldn't be starting Aidoo because he might play poorly, but saying we should be starting Uros who we know is playing poorly, makes no sense.