'10 FL K Michael Palardy

[Berry4Heisman]

:unsure:

We woulda won, at least, 8 games last year with a half-way decent special teams. Palardy would be as big a get as any, IMO.

 

[kptvol]

We woulda won, at least, 8 games last year with a half-way decent special teams. Palardy would be as big a get as any, IMO.

That's pushing it.

 

[BYUVol]

That's pushing it.

UCLA and Auburn would have been in the bag.

 

[dembewbs]

We would have beat auburn if arian could have held on to the ball.

 

[Sabanocchio]

Just watched his highlight video again . . . WOW!!! I'll be more excited if we get him than if we get Scroggins.

Which recruits is Palardy going to attract to UT?

 

[dembewbs]

Which recruits is Palardy going to attract to UT?

Long Snappers.

 

[Berry4Heisman]

Which recruits is Palardy going to attract to UT?

Other guys from St. Thomas Aquinas? lol

 

[dembewbs]

Other guys from St. Thomas Aquinas? lol

Doesnt riggs and another top recruit go there?

 

[utmba93]

Long Snappers.

Thank you for posting that!

This kicker really needs to end the suspense. I can't take it much longer.

 

[bburger991]

STA had like 8 players that are gonna go to a major school IIRC.

No one is gonna follow the kicker though.

 

[Berry4Heisman]

STA had like 8 players that are gonna go to a major school IIRC.

No one is gonna follow the kicker though.

Ya never know.

 

[utmba93]

Ya never know.

But if you've ever been on a football team, you know it's a pretty darn good guess.

Aquinas has some good football players.... that's certain.

 

[Berry4Heisman]

But if you've ever been on a football team, you know it's a pretty darn good guess.

Aquinas has some good football players.... that's certain.

Yeah, just backing up my original post.

 

[1vol]

This kid is a must.

 

[kptvol]

UCLA and Auburn would have been in the bag.

Lincoln was 3/4 in the UCLA game. Hard to really blame him. Besides, him making a field goal would have only sent the game into double overtime. There was still a good chance we lose.

And Lincoln was also 2/2 in the Auburn game with a long of 47. We never got Lincoln close enough to attempt a field goal in the second half.

I think we could use an upgrade at kicker, but I don't think having Palardy last season means we definitely win those two games. We'd still lose to Auburn.

 

[Berry4Heisman]

This kid is a must.

That is basically my point.

 

[wrgn]

We woulda won, at least, 8 games last year with a half-way decent special teams. Palardy would be as big a get as any, IMO.

If you believe that, how many games would we have won with a half decent offense? To be more specific, a half decent quarterback?

 

[Berry4Heisman]

If you believe that, how many games would we have won with a half decent offense? To be more specific, a half decent quarterback?

10+

 

[wrgn]

10+

Yet you would still take the kicker over the quarterback?

 

[VolsDeep]

Yet you would still take the kicker over the quarterback?

Why are you assuming he was choosing one over the other? This thread's focus is on a kicker, therefore his post was focused on the kicking and special teams aspect...

 

[Berry4Heisman]

Yet you would still take the kicker over the quarterback?

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have Scroggins and Palardy both! That would be huge and my perfect scenario!!! And Scroggins would definitely attract the big-time prospects, but I think he goes to USC so I've taken a step off his bandwagon and jumped on the Palardy and Grayson/Rettig bandwagon.

 

[wrgn]

Why are you assuming he was choosing one over the other? This thread's focus is on a kicker, therefore his post was focused on the kicking and special teams aspect...

When he said this...

I'll be more excited if we get him than if we get Scroggins.

it implies one is more valuable.

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to have Scroggins and Palardy both! That would be huge and my perfect scenario!!! And Scroggins would definitely attract the big-time prospects, but I think he goes to USC so I've taken a step off his bandwagon and jumped on the Palardy and Grayson/Rettig bandwagon.

Ok, just quizzing ya.

 

[vol4life35]

If you believe that, how many games would we have won with a half decent offense? To be more specific, a half decent quarterback?

How about if we had a half decent O-Line?

 

[wildberry14]

Lincoln was 3/4 in the UCLA game. Hard to really blame him. Besides, him making a field goal would have only sent the game into double overtime. There was still a good chance we lose.

And Lincoln was also 2/2 in the Auburn game with a long of 47. We never got Lincoln close enough to attempt a field goal in the second half.

I think we could use an upgrade at kicker, but I don't think having Palardy last season means we definitely win those two games. We'd still lose to Auburn.

i was thinking he was 1/4

we scored 24 so 1 FG seems more likely than 3

 

[kptvol]

i was thinking he was 1/4

we scored 24 so 1 FG seems more likely than 3

You're right. I guess I misread the box score. He made one from 47. I think the two misses in regulation were from pretty far away, though.