BldnOrngNAtl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2009
- Messages
- 292
- Likes
- 110
Coleman is near the top of our want list. Only Chaz Green is higher. We'd take him over Robinson. Cullen will hopefully provide much needed help immediately, but not being an EE puts him at a disadvantage.I would not be surprised if we take Coleman despite the possibility of getting our top 3 OL prospects (Cullen, Chaz, JJames). I've even read a few speculate that we are gaining interest in Coleman at the expense of Cullen--an opinion I do not subscribe to. Cullen, being a JUCO, more than likely could really fill a position of need much better than a true freshmen from high school. Nevertheless, I hope we try to take Coleman.
It'll be interesting to see how Coleman does against Jackson Jeffcoat and Ronald Powell in the Army AA game. Perhaps our staff uses this game to decide if he's a "must take" even w/ the likelihood of signing our current top 3 OL recruits...
Uh, no.Is there a chance he gets a look at TE if we still get a few more OL we are after?
Ordinarily he would be. I just don't see him as someone that comes in and earns a starting spot. There's going to be a lot of competition.Sab do you think fulton is that big a project, i know he needs some time under his belt?????
I'd agree he probably projects best as an OT. Robinson on the other hand projects as an OG all the way.