'12 PF Charles Mitchell (MD commit)

#103
#103
Shadowboxer said:
Not looking good for Chievous imo.
Click to expand...

chievous, washpun, miller could all be possibilities, anyone other than those 3 leaving and i'd be somewhat surprised.

also, there has been talk about reese, 1 of the incoming signees, will actually need to attend prep school. i have heard anything about it lately though so i am guessing he is good to go.
 
#104
#104
bleedingTNorange said:
chievous, washpun, miller could all be possibilities, anyone other than those 3 leaving and i'd be somewhat surprised.

also, there has been talk about reese, 1 of the incoming signees, will actually need to attend prep school. i have heard anything about it lately though so i am guessing he is good to go.
Click to expand...

One can only hope that is the case with Reese IMO.
 
#105
#105
bleedingTNorange said:
chievous, washpun, miller could all be possibilities, anyone other than those 3 leaving and i'd be somewhat surprised.

also, there has been talk about reese, 1 of the incoming signees, will actually need to attend prep school. i have heard anything about it lately though so i am guessing he is good to go.
Click to expand...

Hall? That might be the best bet
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#106
#106
DaDuRkEr said:
One can only hope that is the case with Reese IMO.
Click to expand...

yea i would hope that is the case with reese, we are pretty loaded at that position imo, and he's not an elite type thatd walk in and hurdle those guys.

im guessing if he does end up here he may red shirt much like chievous did,unless of course guys like chievous leave.
 
#109
#109
DaDuRkEr said:
BTNO, I think a lot depends on Kenny's attitude and how he reacts.
Click to expand...

kenny isnt gonna screw this up and continue to make mistakes while he is still suspended imo.

this is the kids first time getting in trouble, and if it was something so serious that itd warrant him not returning, well then we would have already heard about a dismissal. CCM wouldnt continue to go out and say that he'll return when i decide if he knew that he was going to be dismissed anyway.

IMO, kenny did something not all that bad, but CCM is seeing this as a very good opportunity to show his seriousness on discipline. once kenny has served a decent amount of games missed, and as long as he follows CCM instructions for his return i would fully expect to see him back in orange.

as i said i expect to see him back before this year is over, but i absolutely would be floored if this kid wasnt in orange next year.

TIFWIW
 
#110
#110
RE: Reese...

It is my understanding that he will not "have" to go to prep school as a qualification issue. The rumor of him maybe attending prep school would be solely for the purpose of improving his game and getting stronger. He is fine academically I believe.
 
#111
#111
cncchris33 said:
RE: Reese...

It is my understanding that he will not "have" to go to prep school as a qualification issue. The rumor of him maybe attending prep school would be solely for the purpose of improving his game and getting stronger. He is fine academically I believe.
Click to expand...

good to know. my only issue with this though is if you go to prep school under good academic standing you only have to go one year, that means he'd be coming in '13. id really rather use that scholarship for some of the guys we were in on for '13 rather than him.

JMO
 
#112
#112
But, if he goes to prep school, we don't have to honor his signing since he didn't enroll the year he signed if I understand the rule book correctly. This could have been discussed between him and CCM behind closed doors... or on a cell phone.
 
#113
#113
I definitely agree with your point BTNO, but at the same time, bringing someone in when we only have 2 to 3 scholly's available that will never see the court is not a good situation no matter which class he comes in with. Reese may be CCM's Ryan Childress
 
#114
#114
i absolutely agree. if i had my wish it would be that reese ended up going elsewhere. he's gonna be a 3 in our system and i really dont see him beating out mcrae or edwards and probably not even chievous, so as you said he probably will never see the court.

basically pick one, him or chievous, but i dont want both on the roster imo, and i also would like to see washpun look elsewhere. stanton has to be more than capable of bringing more than wes, so free up that scholarship as well imo.
 
#115
#115
bleedingTNorange said:
i absolutely agree. if i had my wish it would be that reese ended up going elsewhere. he's gonna be a 3 in our system and i really dont see him beating out mcrae or edwards and probably not even chievous, so as you said he probably will never see the court.

basically pick one, him or chievous, but i dont want both on the roster imo, and i also would like to see washpun look elsewhere. stanton has to be more than capable of bringing more than wes, so free up that scholarship as well imo.
Click to expand...

The way we are looking with so many guys in the 13 class... It wouldn't hurt my feelings if all 3 of those guys were somewhere else next season tbh. I don't have an issue with them and actually would prefer to keep Chievous if we only kept one of them. I think he has some developing and could turn into a really good player. I am all for freeing up those schollys though
 
#116
#116
Plus, I have to admit... I want to see Chievous wearing an orange band-aid and representing like his daddy did!
 
#117
#117
i am definitely interested to see how the off-season pans out. i'll be dissapointed, which is odd to say, if chievous, reese, miller and washpun are all on this team heading into next year.
 
Last edited:
#120
#120
Exactly as long as they are getting the grades, which I'm sure under CCM they definitely are, we shouldn't suffer an APR hit at all.
 
#121
#121
bleedingTNorange said:
Exactly as long as they are getting the grades, which I'm sure under CCM they definitely are, we shouldn't suffer an APR hit at all.
Click to expand...

Every kid is worth 2pts per year in terms of APR. The school loses a pt if they aren't eligible or if they don't return to school. However if they enroll in another 4year school the pt can be regained.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#122
#122
BruinVol said:
Every kid is worth 2pts per year in terms of APR. The school loses a pt if they aren't eligible or if they don't return to school. However if they enroll in another 4year school the pt can be regained.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Gotcha good to know. So then they'd be penalized if wes and chievous were to go to juco?
 
#125
#125
bleedingTNorange said:
Gotcha makes sense. The APR system has always confused me to all ends.
Click to expand...

No doubt about it. Its even more complicated in the partial scholarship sports. Vandy baseball has a perfect score of a 1000 in APR and they have had a number of transfers over the past few years. Schools are getting smarter about manipulating the system.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top