No it is just laughable to me. I think they just shuffle these guys around a few spots each time they update to keeps selling subs. I just shake my head because UT recruits always seem to fall a few slots. They never gain a few. Just SMH at rivals arbitrary movements.
Arbitrary? I don't know that I would say that. Subjective? Without a doubt. I did a side by side comparison of player rankings between Rivals and 247 and it's pretty eye opening the vast disparities in rankings of individual players. The services occasionally don't even agree on what position a player projects for. I guess it's all part of the entertainment. The gem of it all is that people actually pay them money to do this for a living. I personally think it's a damn good gig and I ain't gonna lie, I'm envious.
Examples:
Helm #1 TE rivals, #13 TE 247
Gaulden #25 S rivals, #43 S 247
Raulerson #51 OT rivals, #93 OT 247
Wharton #13 ATH rivals, #81 ATH 247
Creamer #26 ATH rivals, #72 ATH 247
Henderson #17 WDE rivals, #11 WDE 247
McDowell #24 S rivals, #12 S 247
It's all subjective. I won't say that it's dishonest but it's definitely not the final word. That rests with the coaches and their evaluations. For that reason I think it's informative to look at offer lists as well as awards, competition, etc. and form your own opinions. If the services are manipulating the rankings because of financial incentives that would be dishonest and given the personal conduct standards they and the rest of the media set for athletes I would be shocked, shocked I tell you, to find out these services were cheating.