'15 AL LB Keaton Anderson

#155
#155
LebanonVolunteer said:
He has been getting quite a few osu CB's of late. Was hoping he would end up a Vol. IMO kid could be an All SEC type talent.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I would love to land DeBerry, but I just think it's going to be too hard of a pull. Wouldn't care being wrong though. If we can land 1 of Smith, Baker, or DeBerry on top of Cherry and Anderson(both of which I think will be Vols) I would be ecstatic.
 
#156
#156
ljeller said:
Agreed. I would love to land DeBerry, but I just think it's going to be too hard of a pull. Wouldn't care being wrong though. If we can land 1 of Smith, Baker, or DeBerry on top of Cherry and Anderson(both of which I think will be Vols) I would be ecstatic.
Click to expand...
Yep agree with you and LV. Still not sure if Sapp fits into that group or not. Really like him too just not sure yet. I wonder how many LBs we want this year
 
#157
#157
OddFuture said:
Yep agree with you and LV. Still not sure if Sapp fits into that group or not. Really like him too just not sure yet. I wonder how many LBs we want this year
Click to expand...

I'm with you on Sapp too...I like him a lot, but he would be behind a few on my board. It would definitely be nice to know how many LBs we want to take. 3, 4 maybe? Is Dews a LB? Some tough decisions to be made for sure as to who fits where and why.
 
#158
#158
ljeller said:
I'm with you on Sapp too...I like him a lot, but he would be behind a few on my board. It would definitely be nice to know how many LBs we want to take. 3, 4 maybe? Is Dews a LB? Some tough decisions to be made for sure as to who fits where and why.
Click to expand...

I would guess that 3 would be the number unless there is just someone that's too good to pass on, if so I could see taking 4 but that would be the most.
 
#159
#159
Phat-Phil said:
I would guess that 3 would be the number unless there is just someone that's too good to pass on, if so I could see taking 4 but that would be the most.
Click to expand...

Yep I agree. The only reason I said maybe 4 was whether or not Dews will be a LB. I think 3 is probably the number(including Dews) unless one of the elite guys wants on board like Smith, Baker, or DeBerry.
 
#160
#160
OddFuture said:
Yep agree with you and LV. Still not sure if Sapp fits into that group or not. Really like him too just not sure yet. I wonder how many LBs we want this year
Click to expand...

My class has always been right at 20. Most feel we will take 2 RB, 2 QB for sure. That gets ya to (22). 3rd WR to (23)? If Butcher, Jackson, and Philips are the DEs, where does Dews fit in #s wise (24) if he is not a LB? If the OL haul is Stewart, Jones, Richmond, and Harrell, what about Clark, or Edoga was actually a Vol lean (25/26)? What about a TE(27)? A lot to see play out.

I see the LB class as 3 right now. Cherry, Dews, and DeBerry. As you mentioned, Smith, Anderson, Baker, Sapp, maybe Kirkland? Who knows.

My 20 breakdown is still.
QB-1
RB-1
WR-2
TE-0
OL-4
DT-2
DE-3
LB-3
CB-2
S-1
LS-1

A week beyond the O&W game and still have not lost anyone yet. Long way to go.
 
#161
#161
LebanonVolunteer said:
My class has always been right at 20. Most feel we will take 2 RB, 2 QB for sure. That gets ya to (22). 3rd WR to (23)? If Butcher, Jackson, and Philips are the DEs, where does Dews fit in #s wise (24) if he is not a LB? If the OL haul is Stewart, Jones, Richmond, and Harrell, what about Clark, or Edoga was actually a Vol lean (25/26)? What about a TE(27)? A lot to see play out.

I see the LB class as 3 right now. Cherry, Dews, and DeBerry. As you mentioned, Smith, Anderson, Baker, Sapp, maybe Kirkland? Who knows.

My 20 breakdown is still.
QB-1
RB-1
WR-2
TE-0
OL-4
DT-2
DE-3
LB-3
CB-2
S-1
LS-1

A week beyond the O&W game and still have not lost anyone yet. Long way to go.
Click to expand...

It's going to be very interesting how it all plays out. I'm still thinking 23-25 but a lot has to happen to get there.
 
#162
#162
LebanonVolunteer said:
My class has always been right at 20. Most feel we will take 2 RB, 2 QB for sure. That gets ya to (22). 3rd WR to (23)? If Butcher, Jackson, and Philips are the DEs, where does Dews fit in #s wise (24) if he is not a LB? If the OL haul is Stewart, Jones, Richmond, and Harrell, what about Clark, or Edoga was actually a Vol lean (25/26)? What about a TE(27)? A lot to see play out.

I see the LB class as 3 right now. Cherry, Dews, and DeBerry. As you mentioned, Smith, Anderson, Baker, Sapp, maybe Kirkland? Who knows.

My 20 breakdown is still.
QB-1
RB-1
WR-2
TE-0
OL-4
DT-2
DE-3
LB-3
CB-2
S-1
LS-1

A week beyond the O&W game and still have not lost anyone yet. Long way to go.
Click to expand...

I really think we need more then just 2 CB's IMO
 
#169
#169
LebanonVolunteer said:
My class has always been right at 20. Most feel we will take 2 RB, 2 QB for sure. That gets ya to (22). 3rd WR to (23)? If Butcher, Jackson, and Philips are the DEs, where does Dews fit in #s wise (24) if he is not a LB? If the OL haul is Stewart, Jones, Richmond, and Harrell, what about Clark, or Edoga was actually a Vol lean (25/26)? What about a TE(27)? A lot to see play out.

I see the LB class as 3 right now. Cherry, Dews, and DeBerry. As you mentioned, Smith, Anderson, Baker, Sapp, maybe Kirkland? Who knows.

My 20 breakdown is still.
QB-1
RB-1
WR-2
TE-0
OL-4
DT-2
DE-3
LB-3
CB-2
S-1
LS-1

A week beyond the O&W game and still have not lost anyone yet. Long way to go.
Click to expand...

Are you counting Jennings as our lone QB? I really really doubt that will be the case.
 
#170
#170
roosterjbh said:
Are you counting Jennings as our lone QB? I really really doubt that will be the case.
Click to expand...

I have given a couple scenarios where I feel just taking Jennings would make sense. It does seem like the staff would ideally like to take 2. Just have to see how many spots are actually available.
 
#171
#171
LebanonVolunteer said:
I have given a couple scenarios where I feel just taking Jennings would make sense. It does seem like the staff would ideally like to take 2. Just have to see how many spots are actually available.
Click to expand...
I can't see him being the only one. Do you believe he's the future at QB? We really need someone this class who has the ability to be the starter come their redshirt freshman or sophomore year.
 
#173
#173
roosterjbh said:
I can't see him being the only one. Do you believe he's the future at QB? We really need someone this class who has the ability to be the starter come their redshirt freshman or sophomore year.
Click to expand...

Taking one per year every year should become the norm, I just don't think we r there yet.
 
#174
#174
LebanonVolunteer said:
I have given a couple scenarios where I feel just taking Jennings would make sense. It does seem like the staff would ideally like to take 2. Just have to see how many spots are actually available.
Click to expand...

I think they'll be very picky with the next qb spot, no reaches.If we can't land somebody near the top of our board, I think we will pass. Luckily, there r a lot of elite looking qbs we r in on.
 
#175
#175
roosterjbh said:
I can't see him being the only one. Do you believe he's the future at QB? We really need someone this class who has the ability to be the starter come their redshirt freshman or sophomore year.
Click to expand...

I do not. He is about as big of a project QB as I have seen. I do think UT is in very good shape with landing Austin Kendall for the 2016 class. I feel very good about either Fergs or Dobbs being the guy in 2015 and 2016. Maybe even 2017. I feel Kendall is a great talent and could be a starting QB at Tennessee. I could see a scenario playing out where any QB UT gets in 2015 may not see a lot of PT. Land Gentry and IMO he would have a chance to play. I just don't think 2 QBs in 2015 is a huge need. I'd rather see them take 1 and use the other spot for another OL, DL, or LB. Same with taking 2 RBs. IMO 1 is fine having landed 3 great ones in 2014.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top