Reformed Reader
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 737
- Likes
- 193
Couple of factors that probably helped Smith's cause are that he only had one year of eligibility left and UGA wasn't on UA's schedule.depends on what the "other factors" were.
Couple of factors that probably helped Smith's cause are that he only had one year of eligibility left and UGA wasn't on UA's schedule.
In comparison, Kennedy has 3 years left and Tenn & Auburn always play against Alabama.
Those factors, along with the appearance that his transfer isn't based on pursuit of a particular graduate degree at UT that isn't also available at UA and numerous non-restricted schools, probably don't bode well for his appeal at UA.
Hard to tell how much difference factors might make if he appeals to the SEC.
I may be wrong, but I think there's two key NCAA policies regarding grad transfers:This part is big. It defeats the reason the rule was put in place allowing grad transfers to leave and play immediately.
If UT is talking to Kennedy without permission from UA (which UA has not given) that constitutes tampering....I haven't seen Tennessee actively recruiting anymore offensive lineman, so I am only assuming we got a commit from Kennedy and are only pending the Alabama/SEC ruling...
If UT is talking to Kennedy without permission from UA (which UA has not given) that constitutes tampering.
Obviously this was noted after Kennedy had already said which schools he wanted to play for after he graduated. (Which he can, because he had graduated) however, in previous articles it looked like Saban dropped the flag on him in official paperwork that stated he was not allowed to transfer within the SEC and could not talk to SEC schools.
The recruiting happened before that official letter was sent to Kennedy. Which is why there has been no tampering. Those teams stopped once the letter was signed by Saban.
Pretty sure tenn couldn't have had any contact with him until Bama gave a release. I'd bet on it
Correct. Schools aren't allowed to communicate with other schools' players at all without permission from the player's school.
If UT is talking to Kennedy without permission from UA (which UA has not given) that constitutes tampering.
It appears there is a level of "understanding" between UT and Kennedy that doesn't pass the tampering smell test very well.
So you are saying that the kid can't talk to other schools without his coach talking to the schools first? Where's that rule at?
A coach from another school can't contact a current player at another without a written release from
That school. 120% certain on that.
It's in the manual if you want to look it up
A coach from another school can't contact a current player at another without a written release from
That school. 120% certain on that.
It's in the manual if you want to look it up