JDisThereThere
Wu-Tang Killer Tees
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2009
- Messages
- 761
- Likes
- 636
Of course I did not count QB carries as RB carries in my numbers. All QB carries equate to are less RB carries to go around. Also I'm not sure what yards per carry matter at all. Theses kids are looking for carries period. I'd venture to guess a kid would be more content averaging 2.2 yards a carry while getting 95 of them vs averaging 9.5 yards a carry and getting 20 of them. Tell a RB how many times he carries it doesn't matter. My guess is he will look at you like you're crazy.
Imo kids were more inclined to wait their turn 10-15 years ago. Now a day's it's tougher to make a talented kid just sit. Kids know they can get drafted out of NCState or Rutgers just as easily as they can out of UT or A&M if they show out on the field.
When you have 2 5* stud RBs on campus and already working, I would not count on it. Its just reality.
The recruiting is fine. He is signing talent. He is just over signing too much for my liking. Too many kids bailing too quickly. The fans think it's 1997 and kids will just quietly wait. Obviously if you are watching what is going on here in 2015, maybe not so much.
I think the revolving door will definitely slow the development. I love seeing new signees. I'd just like to see a little more developing and a little less "let's make some room for more FR". Jmo
My point was how many carries vs yards per carry is what a young RB is worried about. The whole discussion is imo very few #3-4 RBs in the SEC get many carries and my findings support it.
It all goes back to you insisting that no 3rd RB will ever see the field. Who needs third string right? Especially at RB in the SEC. The reality is injuries happen...they are a total unknown so your point is, well, pointless. Jesus...
And I'm pretty much fine with how that situation worked out. Aren't you? If we bring in 3 a year, and the best one out of those 3 is the only one left, is that really such a bad thing? Does Scott and Paulk not being there have any effect on Hurd's development this offseason?
Also, how do you know that Scott leaving and Paulk getting in trouble wasn't an aberration. This year is also a different situation since we're bringing in 1 juco and 2 High schoolers, instead of 3 high schoolers.
Doesn't Paulk still have a chance of returning too?
A 3rd string RB? Sure. Its just my opinion that in UTs current situation, the 3rd,4th,5th string guys are going to have to be very very patient. We'll see if these guys coming in are the patient type.
All you have to do is look at UGA this year to understand the need to take 3 backs this year.
Sony, Chubb, Gurley all played significant time this year and at the end of the year it was only Chubb when Gurley and Sony were hurt.
Come on down son. Time to be a Tennessee Vol
I don't even know why I was trying to talk sense to him, I'd have better luck trying to teach my garbage can about recruiting than him.
A 3rd string RB? Sure. Its just my opinion that in UTs current situation, the 3rd,4th,5th string guys are going to have to be very very patient. We'll see if these guys coming in are the patient type. I suppose Scott wasn't.
It all goes back to you insisting that no 3rd RB will ever see the field. Who needs third string right? Especially at RB in the SEC. The reality is injuries happen...they are a total unknown so your point is, well, pointless. Jesus...
I think adding Kamara, RDAIV, and another FR to Hurd would have been reasonable. Also adding guys like Bruce, and Perry. Imo the 3rd RB, much like the 3rd QB in a class is a waste. I'd take 2 at most and have alot better chance of them sticking long term and my time invested coaching them is time well spent. Jmo
I think adding Kamara, RDAIV, and another FR to Hurd would have been reasonable. Also adding guys like Bruce, and Perry. Imo the 3rd RB, much like the 3rd QB in a class is a waste. I'd take 2 at most and have alot better chance of them sticking long term and my time invested coaching them is time well spent. Jmo