KnoxVillain
Big Orange Faithless
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 11,685
- Likes
- 1,286
Funny how fast names can come and go from our "board".
Jones named us his leader within hours of Settle naming Clemson his new leader. They may have nothing to do with each other, but something changed between us and Settles, it appears.
I'd love to have him but don't we keep hearing that he is having academic trouble. I'd rather take Mckenzie, and Jones and possibly Quentez Johnson then risk taking Settle and him mot qualifying.
I'd love to have him but don't we keep hearing that he is having academic trouble. I'd rather take Mckenzie, and Jones and possibly Quentez Johnson then risk taking Settle and him mot qualifying.
IMO Johnson is the "slow play" option for McKenzie and Jones. I think if they get those 2, that's it. With news that Johnson may wait till closer to NSD, he is the perfect candidate to be the fall back guy for the Vols this year. Get the other 2, we pass. Miss on Jones and Johnson would be a good get late. JMO
I think DJ called and gave a commitment to the coaches is why Settle changed leaders. JMO of course. Maybe the coaches like what they see early from the potential DT kids that they signed this class, and feel they only need to take 2 elite DTs this class. I still think they should take Settle if he wanted in, but I don't get paid $3 million a year to make those decisions.
very true.. I would love to have Settle play for UT,but Butch and Co. are paid to make these decisions and I will roll with whatever they decide... I wouldn't even begin to try the crap rolling around in the TG and QD threads..thats for them to decide,not me...
at any other position,I tend to agree,but not at DT...
and especially when 1 of the 3 is a JUCO...
Just out of curiosity, would you guys rather have Settle or Tuttle. The obvious answer is both but I'm taking that option away.