UTVolinExile
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
- Messages
- 4,909
- Likes
- 8,353
Right.. And what is behind them is the point
I feel like we UT fans are becoming dangerously delusional with respect to recruiting, particularly with the OL. The OL positions, in particular, are not accurately ranked by the recruiting sites. Taking our OL class from last year, for example. Hall, the lowest ranked OL recruit, was the most ready to contribute and he started games due to injury. Jones also contributed whereas Richmond, our highest ranked OL, redshirted. This does not mean that Richmond will not be our best OL from the class just that the rankings are generally harder to predict with respect to OLs, including readiness to contribute.
Plus, most OLs are developmental positions and that includes OLs who ultimately play in the NFL. So, for every Cam Robinson and Laremy Tunsil (who defy the typical progression for OLs) there are dozens of OLs who redshirt and/or don't play early but then end up being NFL players, even elite NFL players.
What does this mean for Niehaus? Maybe nothing but he seems to have the tools and temperament to be a very good OL player. The interest and offers he is receiving is more indicative of his potential than his ranking. Also, rankings, unlike for skill players, are much less meaningful. Here, Niehaus is getting offers from elite programs, which outstrips his current ranking, and I think his trajectory is promising. Finally, UT is in a good spot with OL recruiting. Right now, Johnson is a very solid prospect. Stewart, if he gets on campus, is another very solid prospect. We are in on Dickerson and he is, seemingly, an elite OL prospect. And, Niehaus looks like a good prospect who could contribute along the typical OL progression. All in all, we are in a good spot and the fans who expect every OL prospect to be a top 250 player will be bitterly disappointed. Just remember that Bama, which routinely has an elite OL, frequently recruits 3* alongside 5* and 4* players and the 3* end up being very good players.
I feel like we UT fans are becoming dangerously delusional with respect to recruiting, particularly with the OL. The OL positions, in particular, are not accurately ranked by the recruiting sites. Taking our OL class from last year, for example. Hall, the lowest ranked OL recruit, was the most ready to contribute and he started games due to injury. Jones also contributed whereas Richmond, our highest ranked OL, redshirted. This does not mean that Richmond will not be our best OL from the class just that the rankings are generally harder to predict with respect to OLs, including readiness to contribute.
Plus, most OLs are developmental positions and that includes OLs who ultimately play in the NFL. So, for every Cam Robinson and Laremy Tunsil (who defy the typical progression for OLs) there are dozens of OLs who redshirt and/or don't play early but then end up being NFL players, even elite NFL players.
What does this mean for Niehaus? Maybe nothing but he seems to have the tools and temperament to be a very good OL player. The interest and offers he is receiving is more indicative of his potential than his ranking. Also, rankings, unlike for skill players, are much less meaningful. Here, Niehaus is getting offers from elite programs, which outstrips his current ranking, and I think his trajectory is promising. Finally, UT is in a good spot with OL recruiting. Right now, Johnson is a very solid prospect. Stewart, if he gets on campus, is another very solid prospect. We are in on Dickerson and he is, seemingly, an elite OL prospect. And, Niehaus looks like a good prospect who could contribute along the typical OL progression. All in all, we are in a good spot and the fans who expect every OL prospect to be a top 250 player will be bitterly disappointed. Just remember that Bama, which routinely has an elite OL, frequently recruits 3* alongside 5* and 4* players and the 3* end up being very good players.
I feel like we UT fans are becoming dangerously delusional with respect to recruiting, particularly with the OL. The OL positions, in particular, are not accurately ranked by the recruiting sites. Taking our OL class from last year, for example. Hall, the lowest ranked OL recruit, was the most ready to contribute and he started games due to injury. Jones also contributed whereas Richmond, our highest ranked OL, redshirted. This does not mean that Richmond will not be our best OL from the class just that the rankings are generally harder to predict with respect to OLs, including readiness to contribute.
Plus, most OLs are developmental positions and that includes OLs who ultimately play in the NFL. So, for every Cam Robinson and Laremy Tunsil (who defy the typical progression for OLs) there are dozens of OLs who redshirt and/or don't play early but then end up being NFL players, even elite NFL players.
What does this mean for Niehaus? Maybe nothing but he seems to have the tools and temperament to be a very good OL player. The interest and offers he is receiving is more indicative of his potential than his ranking. Also, rankings, unlike for skill players, are much less meaningful. Here, Niehaus is getting offers from elite programs, which outstrips his current ranking, and I think his trajectory is promising. Finally, UT is in a good spot with OL recruiting. Right now, Johnson is a very solid prospect. Stewart, if he gets on campus, is another very solid prospect. We are in on Dickerson and he is, seemingly, an elite OL prospect. And, Niehaus looks like a good prospect who could contribute along the typical OL progression. All in all, we are in a good spot and the fans who expect every OL prospect to be a top 250 player will be bitterly disappointed. Just remember that Bama, which routinely has an elite OL, frequently recruits 3* alongside 5* and 4* players and the 3* end up being very good players.
I feel like we UT fans are becoming dangerously delusional with respect to recruiting, particularly with the OL. The OL positions, in particular, are not accurately ranked by the recruiting sites. Taking our OL class from last year, for example. Hall, the lowest ranked OL recruit, was the most ready to contribute and he started games due to injury. Jones also contributed whereas Richmond, our highest ranked OL, redshirted. This does not mean that Richmond will not be our best OL from the class just that the rankings are generally harder to predict with respect to OLs, including readiness to contribute.
Plus, most OLs are developmental positions and that includes OLs who ultimately play in the NFL. So, for every Cam Robinson and Laremy Tunsil (who defy the typical progression for OLs) there are dozens of OLs who redshirt and/or don't play early but then end up being NFL players, even elite NFL players.
What does this mean for Niehaus? Maybe nothing but he seems to have the tools and temperament to be a very good OL player. The interest and offers he is receiving is more indicative of his potential than his ranking. Also, rankings, unlike for skill players, are much less meaningful. Here, Niehaus is getting offers from elite programs, which outstrips his current ranking, and I think his trajectory is promising. Finally, UT is in a good spot with OL recruiting. Right now, Johnson is a very solid prospect. Stewart, if he gets on campus, is another very solid prospect. We are in on Dickerson and he is, seemingly, an elite OL prospect. And, Niehaus looks like a good prospect who could contribute along the typical OL progression. All in all, we are in a good spot and the fans who expect every OL prospect to be a top 250 player will be bitterly disappointed. Just remember that Bama, which routinely has an elite OL, frequently recruits 3* alongside 5* and 4* players and the 3* end up being very good players.
Well Kendrick can play both tackles. Blair. Hall will be a sophomore, Richmond RS freshman, Ryan Johnson Freshman. And of course Thomas can play if need. So that's 6 options at tackle. We can afford a project if he's expected to pan out.
I feel like we UT fans are becoming dangerously delusional with respect to recruiting, particularly with the OL. The OL positions, in particular, are not accurately ranked by the recruiting sites. Taking our OL class from last year, for example. Hall, the lowest ranked OL recruit, was the most ready to contribute and he started games due to injury. Jones also contributed whereas Richmond, our highest ranked OL, redshirted. This does not mean that Richmond will not be our best OL from the class just that the rankings are generally harder to predict with respect to OLs, including readiness to contribute.
Plus, most OLs are developmental positions and that includes OLs who ultimately play in the NFL. So, for every Cam Robinson and Laremy Tunsil (who defy the typical progression for OLs) there are dozens of OLs who redshirt and/or don't play early but then end up being NFL players, even elite NFL players.
What does this mean for Niehaus? Maybe nothing but he seems to have the tools and temperament to be a very good OL player. The interest and offers he is receiving is more indicative of his potential than his ranking. Also, rankings, unlike for skill players, are much less meaningful. Here, Niehaus is getting offers from elite programs, which outstrips his current ranking, and I think his trajectory is promising. Finally, UT is in a good spot with OL recruiting. Right now, Johnson is a very solid prospect. Stewart, if he gets on campus, is another very solid prospect. We are in on Dickerson and he is, seemingly, an elite OL prospect. And, Niehaus looks like a good prospect who could contribute along the typical OL progression. All in all, we are in a good spot and the fans who expect every OL prospect to be a top 250 player will be bitterly disappointed. Just remember that Bama, which routinely has an elite OL, frequently recruits 3* alongside 5* and 4* players and the 3* end up being very good players.
1) Kendrick
2) Blair
3) Hall
4) Johnson
5) Thomas
6 options? Kendrick can't play LT & RT at same time
I feel like we UT fans are becoming dangerously delusional with respect to recruiting, particularly with the OL. The OL positions, in particular, are not accurately ranked by the recruiting sites. Taking our OL class from last year, for example. Hall, the lowest ranked OL recruit, was the most ready to contribute and he started games due to injury. Jones also contributed whereas Richmond, our highest ranked OL, redshirted. This does not mean that Richmond will not be our best OL from the class just that the rankings are generally harder to predict with respect to OLs, including readiness to contribute.
Plus, most OLs are developmental positions and that includes OLs who ultimately play in the NFL. So, for every Cam Robinson and Laremy Tunsil (who defy the typical progression for OLs) there are dozens of OLs who redshirt and/or don't play early but then end up being NFL players, even elite NFL players.
What does this mean for Niehaus? Maybe nothing but he seems to have the tools and temperament to be a very good OL player. The interest and offers he is receiving is more indicative of his potential than his ranking. Also, rankings, unlike for skill players, are much less meaningful. Here, Niehaus is getting offers from elite programs, which outstrips his current ranking, and I think his trajectory is promising. Finally, UT is in a good spot with OL recruiting. Right now, Johnson is a very solid prospect. Stewart, if he gets on campus, is another very solid prospect. We are in on Dickerson and he is, seemingly, an elite OL prospect. And, Niehaus looks like a good prospect who could contribute along the typical OL progression. All in all, we are in a good spot and the fans who expect every OL prospect to be a top 250 player will be bitterly disappointed. Just remember that Bama, which routinely has an elite OL, frequently recruits 3* alongside 5* and 4* players and the 3* end up being very good players.
It was great. I feel like everything exceeded what I expected. It was a pleasant surprise, said Niehaus, whos ranked the nations No. 94 offensive tackle in the 247Sports Composite for the 2016 class. I just really expected an average SEC team. But I feel like, when I came out, I just (liked) everything about it the way the coaches handled their players, the way they handled the recruits even, the way Coach (Butch) Jones was talking with me a lot. That just exceeded what I thought it would be, and it was a pleasant surprise.
Im thinking I might (visit) Cincinnati, Niehaus said. But, I mean, Ive already been down to Cincinnati so much, and Ive been around their players so much with my brother.
Ohio States been my dream school, like, my whole life, really. If they were to make an offer, it would kind of put some pressure on me. But thats when it would come down to where I would have the best environment. Thats when I would compare the coaches and stuff, instead of just actual football, because the football is about right there.
What I really like about them is theyre really personal, Niehaus said. Theyre a lot more personal than some people Ive come across, and (I like) the way they just talk with my parents and talk with me, and how they are as people. Coach Jones, he was just saying, We want you, and its a great place for you here. It wasnt any pressure at all. He didnt pressure me or push down on me, which is what I really liked about it. He was just more relaxed and friendly about it, about saying, Hey, weve got a place for you here, and if you dont choose us, then thats your choice. But if you do, thats great. Thats the kind of characteristic of a coach that I really like.
Thats one of the main things Ive been thinking about, Niehaus said. When I started talking to Tennessee, that was the first thing that popped in my mind like, Hey, Grandma and Grandpa are going to be right down the street. It would be just like my brother at Cincinnati, how he can just come home whenever he wants. Thats just what came to my mind as soon as I thought Tennessee.