SouthKnoxVOL
100% piped in crown noise
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2012
- Messages
- 12,072
- Likes
- 25,571
I would prefer to take a quarterback if one of the too guys on our board want in. I don't think we should take one just to take one though. What's the difference in taking a guy who really isn't on our board and a walk on?
I can't recall us taking a walk on with zero college offers. They just don't have offers from bigger programs. That's the kind of quarterback we'll take if we miss on too many more, so why waste the scholarship?
I think they just need to really concentrate on getting a QB for the 18 class. Not really a big concern this year. We have Dormady, Jones, and JG. If they get one this year, good...if not...oh well. More pressing needs than QB this year.
Rivals QB Challenge Finals...
"Recruiting wrap: Sears is aiming for a June commitment. He most recently visited Alabama, Tennessee and Vanderbilt.
Performance: Whereas some quarterbacks in attendance could benefit from being more focused on their mechanics, Sears looked too far in the other direction. The four-star passer was the most robotic of the 12 quarterbacks in attendance, with a deliberate and static arm motion. The 6-foot-3, 195-pound Sears had one of the weaker arms at the event in terms of velocity, although his best throw on the day was the long toss into the net where he threw with proper trajectory and scored a pair of hits."
- Rivals
I would rather not take a QB this class
Where do we look if Sears goes elsewhere? We've already missed on Johnson, Perry, and Hockman. Hooker and Ifedi both fit our system, but we haven't offered either. Who else might we look at?