'17 TN OT Obinna Eze (Memphis commit)

MichaelScottShutsdooronDunder-Mifflinguy_zps82023db0.gif

Which one am I? I find it funny no one knows sarcasm without someone having to be told. You morons are why Vandy fans say we are stupid.
 
Last edited:
Which one am I? I find it funny no one knows sarcasm without someone having to be told. You morons are why Vandy fans say we are stupid.

If you are going to call others morons, you should probably make sure your post is done correctly first. That sentence is pretty poorly written for someone who is NOT suppose to be a moron. I would dare say that it's improper grammar, such as this, that causes Vandy fans to call us stupid.

Aside from that, and the fact that you just called a man doing God's work in another country a moron and stupid, all is well. :hi:

Sarcasm or not? Are you smart enough to tell?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
If you are going to call others morons, you should probably make sure your post is done correctly first. That sentence is pretty poorly written for someone who is NOT suppose to be a moron. I would dare say that it's improper grammar, such as this, that causes Vandy fans to call us stupid.

Aside from that, and the fact that you just called a man doing God's work in another country a moron and stupid, all is well. :hi:

Sarcasm or not? Are you smart enough to tell?

Be honest, you're not smart. Poorly written does not mean incorrect. I stand by my work and laugh at people who cannot identify sarcasm. I bet you are a simpleton, a blue fonter if you will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Which one am I? I find it funny no one knows sarcasm without someone having to be told. You morons are why Vandy fans say we are stupid.

While there are some crazy people here, if go with a different argument if I were you. I think I speak for everyone when I say no one cares what their fans think. They're irrelevant.
 
Be honest, you're not smart.

I've never claimed to be smart, but interestingly enough, I am a Professor and Program Director in Higher Education

Poorly written does not mean incorrect.

Debatable. Non debatable is that poorly written means it should be given less merit since the person writing it apparently doesn't care enough to correctly convey their message.

I stand by my work and laugh at people who cannot identify sarcasm. I've got nothing for you here. You are who you are. The bigger question would be. Who's laughing at you?

I bet you are a simpleton, a blue fonter if you will. <----Interestingly enough. I am actually one of the ones that instigated the whole blue font thing on here, although I have never once used it myself. Thanks for recognizing my body of work though

:hi:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Baldbiker, MLK, Lincoln. Three ground breaking people. I personally believe the blue font creation was by far the greatest achievement among them.

Wow. You've put me in some mighty fine company. I knew you liked me. :)


Seriously, I'm just messing with you (maybe I should have used blue font). I figure this whole conversation is doomed to be moved to the black hole known as the Off Topic Forum soon enough anyway.
 
Wow. You've put me in some mighty fine company. I knew you liked me. :)


Seriously, I'm just messing with you (maybe I should have used blue font). I figure this whole conversation is doomed to be moved to the black hole known as the Off Topic Forum soon enough anyway.
Word, I like banter. I feel I get on here so I won't argue with my wife.
 
If you are going to call others morons, you should probably make sure your post is done correctly first. That sentence is pretty poorly written for someone who is NOT suppose to be a moron. I would dare say that it's improper grammar, such as this, that causes Vandy fans to call us stupid.

Aside from that, and the fact that you just called a man doing God's work in another country a moron and stupid, all is well. :hi:

Sarcasm or not? Are you smart enough to tell?

I think that the term you are looking for is Ignoranus...
Offspring of Ignorant and arsehole :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Wow. You've put me in some mighty fine company. I knew you liked me. :)


Seriously, I'm just messing with you (maybe I should have used blue font). I figure this whole conversation is doomed to be moved to the black hole known as the Off Topic Forum soon enough anyway.

It's nice to see that you are finally getting the recognition and accolades for your fine body of work here on VN :salute:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
that was Neal, he had 1000+ yard season with only 5 wins. and where is the coaching in a one yard contest? and its Vandy, I don't care if the entire Bama staff goes over to them we should be able to pick up a yard over two plays. instead we lost ground.

The only reason Neal even sniffed 1000 yards was because he had such a good OL opening run lanes for him.

And I get the whole "it's Vandy" argument, but that's ignoring the fact that they were better than us that year and the talent levels were the most equal they've been in most TN fans' lifetimes.

My question for people who downplay that OL is this: would you not trade them in a second for what we have? In almost every measurable category, they were the best OL we've seen since Fulmer left (and arguably since his later years as well). If we'd had that OL last year, we'd have been in Atlanta and our rushing totals would have been even more impressive.
 
The only reason Neal even sniffed 1000 yards was because he had such a good OL opening run lanes for him.

And I get the whole "it's Vandy" argument, but that's ignoring the fact that they were better than us that year and the talent levels were the most equal they've been in most TN fans' lifetimes.

My question for people who downplay that OL is this: would you not trade them in a second for what we have? In almost every measurable category, they were the best OL we've seen since Fulmer left (and arguably since his later years as well). If we'd had that OL last year, we'd have been in Atlanta and our rushing totals would have been even more impressive.

does this assume that those guys have now been in the system for a couple years? if its strictly taking 2013 OL over 2016 OL I am saying no. those guys had all the talent in the world but they don't fit this scheme. and the guys we got aren't exactly chopped liver.

and these have some nastiness in them that 13 didn't, one freaking yard last game of the season. and we know these guys have actually worked out the whole time they have been here. and oh yeah depth.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
does this assume that those guys have now been in the system for a couple years? if its strictly taking 2013 OL over 2016 OL I am saying no. those guys had all the talent in the world but they don't fit this scheme. and the guys we got aren't exactly chopped liver.

and these have some nastiness in them that 13 didn't, one freaking yard last game of the season. and we know these guys have actually worked out the whole time they have been here. and oh yeah depth.

I'm talking starting 5 for starting 5. If you wouldn't make that trade, you're crazy. Even if the 2013 line was "lacking nastiness" or couldn't get a yard against Vandy (which wouldn't be a problem with our current backs anyway), you never had to worry about them completely falling apart like this

I'll trade that "nastiness" for the ability to not crumble against a four man rush every time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top