Dobbs 4 Heisman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2015
- Messages
- 16,800
- Likes
- 17,074
When I think of a program-changing QB, I think of more than someone who couldn't even win his division. Dobbs was an above average QB, but he didn't change our program. Deshaun Watson changed Clemson's program. Johnny Manziel changed A&M's program. Josh Dobbs "changed" Tennessee from a 7-6 team to a 9-4 team. Not a huge accomplishment. That isn't to say we won't miss him this season, or that he didn't accomplish a lot statistically. I just don't see him as a "program changer", but maybe that term is subjective/relative.
Clemson beat Ohio State and Oklahoma in Orange Bowls without Deshaun Watson. They won a division title over Florida State a few years before signing Deshaun Watson. They were already a great program. He simply put them over the hump and made them elite. It's not like they were having 5-7 seasons like we were before Dobbs and losing to their rival for a decade straight. I would argue Watson and Dobbs both improved their programs by the same margin. Watson took a great program and made it elite. While Dobbs took a bad program and made it good.
I doubt Deshaun Watson would have done any better if he was in the same position Dobbs was. And I have no doubt Dobbs would have done just as good as Watson if he was in the same position he was.
Manziel is a bad example to bring up. Like Dobbs he never won any titles. All he did was win a heisman which brought a lot of positive attention early on but then because of his off-field transgressions and poor behavior, I would argue he has been more of a negative for A&M than a positive.