'18 TN WR Tykee Kellogg

#226
#226
Him not announcing wasn't the news I was hoping to hear. I was looking forward to another talented player coming on board. Get some momentum. I hope this isn't because he's having second thoughts or leaning away from us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#227
#227
HoleInTheRoof said:
Him not announcing wasn't the news I was hoping to hear. I was looking forward to another talented player coming on board. Get some momentum. I hope this isn't because he's having second thoughts or leaning away from us.
Click to expand...

No that's not the case. I was told that we are the choice. Was not told why he decided not to do it this week though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#229
#229
WilliamDuVOL said:
Oh pls. Pls be because a bunch of top in state guys jump on board at the O&W game lol.
Click to expand...

Ya I'm not sure why exactly my buddy really didn't go into to much. Said we still are the favorite. Maybe they are planning a nuclear boom at orange and white game. That would be the tots mcgoats!!!
 
#234
#234
dyllisvol42 said:
Ya I'm not sure why exactly my buddy really didn't go into to much. Said we still are the favorite. Maybe they are planning a nuclear boom at orange and white game. That would be the tots mcgoats!!!
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#237
#237
I thought I had seen on the first post saying he was clocked at a 4.48.... No way he is a 4.48... But I wouldn't say he is slow...
 
#238
#238
Ulysees E. McGill said:
So Kellogg is not fast, but he is big, physical and catches the ball well? Is that the general consensus?
Click to expand...

I actually don't think he is very physical... He does high point the ball... But I also judge his physicality on hand fighting on his breaks and so forth...

I can see why colleges like him because there are for sure tools he has to work with...
 
#239
#239
Caleb59seal said:
I thought I had seen on the first post saying he was clocked at a 4.48.... No way he is a 4.48... But I wouldn't say he is slow...
Click to expand...

I believe that 40 time came from Hudl. I too don't think he's that fast either. More like a 4.58 instead of a 4.48 to me.

Of course, I'm basing this all on film & not seeing him in person so he may very well run a 4.48 but not likely he's that fast. Thanks.
 
#241
#241
Caleb59seal said:
I actually don't think he is very physical... He does high point the ball... But I also judge his physicality on hand fighting on his breaks and so forth...

I can see why colleges like him because there are for sure tools he has to work with...
Click to expand...

Folks said he blocked well, which usually indicates a predisposition to physical play imo. Maybe he just hasn't been taught how to use that physicality when it comes separating from DBs.
 
#243
#243
Ulysees E. McGill said:
Folks said he blocked well, which usually indicates a predisposition to physical play imo. Maybe he just hasn't been taught how to use that physicality when it comes separating from DBs.
Click to expand...

I was just saying what I have seen on his highlights I don't see physicality when it comes to fighting of defenders but he is also like 6'5" going against kids 6" shorter than he is too... would love to see a full game
 
#244
#244
tonybologna said:
I believe that 40 time came from Hudl. I too don't think he's that fast either. More like a 4.58 instead of a 4.48 to me.

Of course, I'm basing this all on film & not seeing him in person so he may very well run a 4.48 but not likely he's that fast. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Impressive that you can judge tenths of seconds...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#248
#248
tonybologna said:
I believe that 40 time came from Hudl. I too don't think he's that fast either. More like a 4.58 instead of a 4.48 to me.

Of course, I'm basing this all on film & not seeing him in person so he may very well run a 4.48 but not likely he's that fast. Thanks.
Click to expand...

barrythesnout said:
Impressive that you can judge tenths of seconds...
Click to expand...

tonybologna said:
I'm not judging tenths of seconds. I'm just saying & expecting Kellogg to have that type of 40 time.
Click to expand...

That is actually exactly what you did. The difference you stated in your OP was one tenth of a second difference. You are stating that you feel you can tell the difference between 40 times that are one tenth of a second different and that TK looks one tenth of a second slower than his listed time suggests.



(Oh I've gone and done it now. :banghead2:)
EMGNstrangefacts4.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8 people
#250
#250
Glitch said:
That is actually exactly what you did. The difference you stated in your OP was one tenth of a second difference. You are stating that you feel you can tell the difference between 40 times that are one tenth of a second different and that TK looks one tenth of a second slower than his listed time suggests.



(Oh I've gone and done it now. :banghead2:)
EMGNstrangefacts4.gif
Click to expand...

I'm sorry Glitch but you are wrong there buddy. How much can we really tell the difference on the field from a 4.48 to a 4.58? Not a lot but comparing a 4.48 to a 4.68 you can tell the difference. That player with the 4.48 will pretty much run away from that 4.68 guy but not the 4.58 guy. Thanks buddy.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top