Rickyvol77
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Messages
- 16,786
- Likes
- 21,566
Self defense and appropriate gun use far outnumbers illegal acts, accidents and suicidesTwo points: (1) if you're gonna weigh the "bad" uses of a gun (murder, suicide, robbery, kidnapping, etc.), against the "good" uses (self-defense), you're not gonna like how the math comes out (trust me, it's not in your favor); and (2) not all valid uses of a gun in self-defense prevent an innocent killing, even if the the perpetrator was killed. In many cases, shooting a home intruder doesn't mean that if the home intruder hadn't been shot and killed that the homeowner would have been shot and killed.
You have a dark soul. You need to just stop posting.Two points: (1) if you're gonna weigh the "bad" uses of a gun (murder, suicide, robbery, kidnapping, etc.), against the "good" uses (self-defense), you're not gonna like how the math comes out (trust me, it's not in your favor); and (2) not all valid uses of a gun in self-defense prevent an innocent killing, even if the the perpetrator was killed. In many cases, shooting a home intruder doesn't mean that if the home intruder hadn't been shot and killed that the homeowner would have been shot and killed.
My God man, you are an extremely petty, small, heartless person.
And for liking that horrible take Luther, you aren't much better.
I’m telling you they were mad that this horrific event overshadowed their GF law signing ceremony.
Two points: (1) if you're gonna weigh the "bad" uses of a gun (murder, suicide, robbery, kidnapping, etc.), against the "good" uses (self-defense), you're not gonna like how the math comes out (trust me, it's not in your favor); and (2) not all valid uses of a gun in self-defense prevent an innocent killing, even if the the perpetrator was killed. In many cases, shooting a home intruder doesn't mean that if the home intruder hadn't been shot and killed that the homeowner would have been shot and killed.
I feel like there is something not being reported. Somebody(s) screwed up big.
The contractor in Knoxville who used an AR to defend the homeowners he was working from from a follow home attack.Own this with it
‘I had to do what I had to do:’ Florida woman, 69, shoots, kills intruder
Resident fatally shoots suspected burglar in Walnut; 2nd suspect sought | KTLA
Brownsboro homeowner armed with AR-15 stops burglary suspect
Hatchet attack in Ohio state park leads to shots fired
South Carolina Boy, 13, Uses Mother's Gun To Fend Off Two Criminals Who Were Breaking Into His Home While He Was Alone, Fatally Shoots Burglar, Scares Off Second Suspect: Police - Truth Tent
MAN SHOT AND KILLED AFTER FORCING HIS WAY INTO A HOME IN LENOIR CITY
Atlanta ride share driver shoots alleged police impersonator making phony traffic in Target parking lot
Homeowner kills 2 intruders, holds 2 more at gunpoint for police | WANE 15
Armed robber on a bike killed by man he was trying to rob in South Philadelphia, police say
Man shot intruder at home on West Side; suspect later escaped from ambulance, police say
Tacoma hotel employee shoots man who threatened 3 employees with a knife
All these are just from this month and there is a 100% chance it's a drop in the bucket compared to the total lawful defense usages out there.
Good luck trying to change it. If you’re scared of people with guns then be prepared to defend yourself. I’m not stupid enough (like you) to believe if I give up mine the criminals won’t have one either.If you believe in a robust 2nd Amendment (i.e., nearly no impediments to gun ownership), you're implicitly saying all these senseless deaths are not as important as/don't outweigh your right to play Rambo.
You're the victim of 20/20 hind site
What I want and think about the 2nd and gun control take a back seat to the grieving families here, one grieved so hard his heart couldn't take it. And you made fun of it, turned it into a political football for a cheap point and likes. Shame on you for typing it, Eff you for trying to defend it. Literal POS!If you believe in a robust 2nd Amendment (i.e., nearly no impediments to gun ownership), you're implicitly saying all these senseless deaths are not as important as/don't outweigh your right to play Rambo.
If you believe in a robust 2nd Amendment (i.e., nearly no impediments to gun ownership), you're implicitly saying all these senseless deaths are not as important as/don't outweigh your right to play Rambo.