PoochPunt3rdDown
Boom. +14. Moby Dick.
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2010
- Messages
- 29,218
- Likes
- 21
Alaska- That could be the most retarded thing i've ever seen anybody post. Those "fast games" sure brought us multiple championships in while Bruce was here, didn't it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
the offer list. 10 out of 10 successful coaches can't be wrong.
Pretty sure Murray State is the team from Ky, whose success we want to emulate.
One good one out of three was not even average. Chism, however, was great and made up for the other two.
To clarify:
--regarding skills, you have no idea about his strength, speed, agility, elevation, shot, ability to drive, handles, using both hands effectively, defense, running the floor, post up game, or rebounding ability, correct?
--regarding offers, you have no idea if he went to a bunch of camps, played aau ball/tourneys around the country, sent out tapes, sent out letters, had his coach/school send out tapes/letters, etc, right?
--regarding murray state and his offer list, murray would have beaten several sec teams, and has, over the past few years, but if this kid had an offer from shoddy teams like ole miss, ms st, ark, auburn, lsu and ga/bama to an extent, you would feel better and it shows he's a player? Because a crappy sec team offers?
There is so much idiocy on this site at times that it is laughable.
Wonder what his hat table looked like at his pc?
Quite a few mid majors have had a lot more success than us in the NCAA's in fact quite a few every year. This ain't football and the fact he got a kid to come to Knoxville over even a small campus in Florida is pretty impressive.So for the record, you support us competing with mid-majors for prospects?
IMO the strength of many mid-major teams, like Murray State, is not their talent level, but their coaching, schemes, and intensity.
Way to get around the no name-calling policy by calling me an idiot without really doing it. Clever.:clapping:
Umm out of all the gloom and doom have any of the people screaming the sky is falling over this watched one second of tape on him? Googled his HS stats? Did any looking into him other than noticing a few people before you whined about it, so he must be bad?
How about before we plan the oust we give the guy a chance to show his stuff on the court. To this point no one has any idea What kind of system he is going to run. We can make educated guesses based on his past but for all we know he only ran that system out of necessity. Personally I don't give a f what kind of system he runs as long as it is effective.
Also the performance of the guys he brought into this class out of desperation will tell a lot more about his ability to evaluate and develop talent than anything. Personally I never thought either of those was a strength of Pearl. I can guarantee you at no point will there be an NBA interview where some all star player credits Bruce Pearl for developing him to that level. mostly because all the players Pearl put in the League went to Euro or the Developmental League. Even Harris might end up there. I have so far been impressed with everything I have read on this site and others on the guys he brought in and their impact thus far on the team.
All of this is however useless until a ball gets tipped in an actual game. This commitment will also have no context until the rest of the class is signed. For all we know the kid grows 2 inches and gains 50 pounds before he hits campus and all of a sudden we have a beast in the post with a legit outside shot.
So for the record, you support us competing with mid-majors for prospects?
IMO the strength of many mid-major teams, like Murray State, is not their talent level, but their coaching, schemes, and intensity.
Way to get around the no name-calling policy by calling me an idiot without really doing it. Clever.:clapping:
Quite a few mid majors have had a lot more success than us in the NCAA's in fact quite a few every year. This ain't football and the fact he got a kid to come to Knoxville over even a small campus in Florida is pretty impressive.
A lot of people tend for forget to put the Pearl phenomenon in perspective. Most of his actual success was on a PR level only. There was actually very little tangible production on the court in the bigger scheme of things. He had one great year. he took UT Basketball to a level it has never been on but I think people are fooling themselves if they think the level he took us to was a Duke, UNC, Kentucky level or oven a Gonzaga level. We are in position IF CCM can produce something close to decent ball this year with the mess he was left with, to build on that.
People are fooling themselves if they think a winning season is a given this year. If we play .500 ball this year we are doing well and that would have been true if Pearl was here.
Look at the mess the roster was in. And they are holes Pearl built over the last 3 years with bad recruiting. He never had luck recruiting at the 1, 4 or 5 spots an d over the years recruited a lot of tweener 2's and 3's and brought in JC point guards. We have one true point on the team this year (Washpaun) and he is an unheralded Martin recruit who I personally think is eventually going to be the best point we have had in years. Which ain't saying much.