2020 Presidential Race

It strains credulity to consider her and her network a valid source... and this "justify immediate attention" is a carefully crafted line. She wants to imply that it's porn... but she is very careful not to call it that because that would raise the stakes for her.

Since you guys are so good on wanting to license things like guns, then surely you'd have no objection to licensing journalists. The license would state they are required to state the truth and nothing but the truth and that they will do their utmost verify all fact that they present or state that they witnessed all of the event they are covering. If unverifiable then they clearly state that. Further they must agree that Anonymous is not a credible source. Licensure just like any other professional who can make an impact on our lives. Journalists would be subject to malpractice and held accountable like other professionals. Before you counter, think about whether you'd prefer to uphold your doctor's right to free speech or his responsibility to determine your state of health (and mind in some cases) and report factually. Further twits, face(similies), and news reports would be accompanied by the reporters proof of licensure. Then we'd know what's opinion or fancy vs what's purported to be factual news reporting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Y9 Vol
Since you guys are so good on wanting to license things like guns, then surely you'd have no objection to licensing journalists. The license would state they are required to state the truth and nothing but the truth and that they will do their utmost verify all fact that they present or state that they witnessed all of the event they are covering. If unverifiable then they clearly state that. Further they must agree that Anonymous is not a credible source. Licensure just like any other professional who can make an impact on our lives. Journalists would be subject to malpractice and held accountable like other professionals. Before you counter, think about whether you'd prefer to uphold your doctor's right to free speech or his responsibility to determine your state of health (and mind in some cases) and report factually. Further twits, face(similies), and news reports would be accompanied by the reporters proof of licensure. Then we'd know what's opinion or fancy vs what's purported to be factual news reporting.
Why not? It's worked so well with attorneys. . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I’m not sure you fully grasp the concept of “hiding.”

If the leftist news doesn't have Biden and Harris live while deifying them, they're hidden. They've pretty well managed to have Trump in their camera sights daily - that's not hidden. Doesn't seem that complicated.
 
What follows is a quote from the Dead American... thread:

Is there anything more Anti-American than attacking the military servicemen who've actually died, been a POW, or been irreparably physically harmed in the line of duty?

It's truly shocking to see some conservatives condoning this. I never thought they could sink to such depths, but here we are.

I'll answer. Yes, IMHO. Selling your position as VP for foreign corruption. There is literally more evidence that Joe did that than the anonymous sources you reference here as though they were proven fact.

Where are you on it?
 
The price at the pump for regular gas in the Houston area is around $1.85/gal. right now.

I hope we don’t have to find out, but who wants to bet it won’t at least triple in 4 years if Biden gets elected?
 
20201021_173614.jpg
1st time voter here.

I didn't follow politics up until the last 4 - 5 years and the Volnation PF has helped open my eyes to the good and bad of politics in our country. Thank you to both sides for helping me realize how important it is for me to get out and vote.
 

VN Store



Back
Top