2020 Presidential Race

#60,304
#60,304
825VOL said:
As many have pointed out before, ALL media is run by 5-6 companies. They do not care about news anymore, only about income. That’s why you have talking heads taking up 90%+ of the airtime giving their opinions(much cheaper) rather than journalists actually covering stories and presenting them to us
Click to expand...

Is there room in the market for a consumer funded true investigative journalism outfit that does real journalism and presents the news with minimal bias? It seems like that is the niche that needs to be filled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, tbwhhs, NurseGoodVol and 2 others
#60,306
#60,306
BowlBrother85 said:
She was "implicated" in what exactly? U.S. Attorney General William Barr's "unmasking probe" formally concluded over two weeks ago without any charges being filed, or even any public report being released, for that matter. That was a big bunch of nothing... pretty much just like this "Hunter Biden laptop story" that you are currently over-hyping because of the election.
Click to expand...
Can you link his findings? Oh. You can't because he's released no public report of his findings.

And it's notable that you fled the Hunter Biden thread after asking ignorant questions and still trying to make the conversation about Evil Rudy, only to have been shown that the emails have been verified by Senate Committee and cryptography.

But by all means... Refuse to follow the story while continuing to comment on it as if you know WTH is going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Switch 625 and StarRaider
#60,307
#60,307
DC_Vol said:
Is there room in the market for a consumer funded true investigative journalism outfit that does real journalism and presents the news with minimal bias? It seems like that is the niche that needs to be filled.
Click to expand...

You would think. Similar to FB and Twitter tho, you have a powerful monopoly on party news right now.

Most people watching the news now are not looking for facts in politics anymore. The current setup is conditioned to reaffirming what people want to believe.
 
#60,310
#60,310
Orange_Crush said:
Can you link his findings? Oh. You can't because he's released no public report of his findings.

And it's notable that you fled the Hunter Biden thread after asking ignorant questions and still trying to make the conversation about Evil Rudy, only to have been shown that the emails have been verified by Senate Committee and cryptography.

But by all means... Refuse to follow the story while continuing to comment on it as if you know WTH is going on.
Click to expand...
I just told you that. If there had been any wrongdoing uncovered... there would have been charges filed and a report of findings released to the public.
 
#60,314
#60,314
luthervol said:
More bs
Texas early voting exceeds total of all 2016 ballots

Voters in Texas do not register by party affiliation, so no one can be sure until the ballots are counted whether one party or the other will benefit from the surge in turnout.
Click to expand...
Might or might not be BS. That’s an NBC model that they use to predict early voting by party in states where people don’t register by party affiliation. They’ve done the same in Wisconsin. It’s certainly not totally accurate, it is NBC after all, but it’s probably pretty close to the actual number.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#60,315
#60,315
BowlBrother85 said:
I just told you that. If there had been any wrongdoing uncovered... there would have been charges filed and a report of findings released to the public.
Click to expand...

I'm pointing out the fact that you're claiming to know what the report found while also pointing out that you haven't seen the results of the report, Einstein.

You REALLY aren't good at this. I mean... REALLY.

Just last night you were trying to bypass conversation about all of this by attacking Rudy Freaky Geenie, when the emails have been validated by Senate Committee for days. When that and the digital signatures were pointed out, you split and had no more comment because your pitiable denials were running thin.

Now, here you are again popping up to discuss as expert that which you have refused to follow, by using conjecture about unseen reports as some kind of evidence.

I'll say it again. This story has broken you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and W.TN.Orange Blood
#60,316
#60,316
Rifleman said:
The analysis you post (do you guys ever read what you post?) says middle income Americans will lose an additional $260 dollars annually. I had no idea it would be that low. Though, it appears it is totally focused on top earners so I'll see if there is better data elsewhere.

If you are really worried about this, then you either make well over $400k a year--congrats if so!!!--and your b*tching falls on deaf ears.

Or, a few hundred dollars is consequential to you and you need to take a little more control of your career and life decisions.
Click to expand...

And Clinton called Trump supporters Despicables. This is truly despicable thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinsd, AM64 and StarRaider
#60,319
#60,319
When recent presidential incumbents were polling behind with 4 days to go, only Obama pulled out a win, and that was more related to polling error than Obama actually being behind. Trump needs a polling error much larger than the 2012 pro-Romney bias to keep his job.

Year: Polling Lead : End Result : Shift

2020: Biden+8.9: tbd: tbd
2012: Romney+0.3 : Obama +3.9 : -4.2 (Incumbent won)
1992: Clinton+7.9 : Clinton +5.6 : -2.3 (Incumbent lost)
1980: Reagan+0.1 : Reagan +9.7 : +9.6 (Incumbent lost)
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#60,321
#60,321
Rifleman said:
When recent presidential incumbents were polling behind with 4 days to go, only Obama pulled out a win, and that was more related to polling error than Obama actually being behind. Trump needs a polling error much larger than the 2012 pro-Romney bias to keep his job.

Year: Polling Lead : End Result : Shift

2020: Biden+8.9: tbd: tbd
2012: Romney+0.3 : Obama +3.9 : -4.2 (Incumbent won)
1992: Clinton+7.9 : Clinton +5.6 : -2.3 (Incumbent lost)
1980: Reagan+0.1 : Reagan +9.7 : +9.6 (Incumbent lost)
Click to expand...
It had to do with turnout. Obama owned the enthusiasm gap over Romney. The polls are not predictive if they can’t accurately account for turnout which they clearly have struggled to do.
 
#60,322
#60,322
Orange_Crush said:
I'm pointing out the fact that you're claiming to know what the report found while also pointing out that you haven't seen the results of the report, Einstein.

You REALLY aren't good at this. I mean... REALLY.

Just last night you were trying to bypass conversation about all of this by attacking Rudy Freaky Geenie, when the emails have been validated by Senate Committee for days. When that and the digital signatures were pointed out, you split and had no more comment because your pitiable denials were running thin.

Now, here you are again popping up to discuss as expert that which you have refused to follow, by using conjecture about unseen reports as some kind of evidence.

I'll say it again. This story has broken you.
Click to expand...
You are acting as if this is some bombshell that is going to influence the outcome of the election and it's not. There is no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Joe Biden. This is reminiscent of the "Lock her up!" nonsense from four years ago... which was quickly dropped after the election. It's a pathetic last ditch effort to save a losing candidate, who has never had a positive message to run on.
 
#60,324
#60,324
BeecherVol said:
Its not going to happen. The gap you see will close because your guy won. Reality is the gap is still there. Joe aint changing that.
Click to expand...
I think the gap will narrow if Biden wins. After all, we Republicans enjoy being called chumps, deplorables, uneducated, racists, told we didn't build that, etc. almost as much as we like to see the Democrats reach across the aisle to savagely bash our Supreme Court nominees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hUTch2002, Carl Pickens, AM64 and 3 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top