MarcoVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2019
- Messages
- 17,919
- Likes
- 84,079
The parties do not want unity. They continually talk about their "base". Uniting people would shrink that base, not grow it. Unity goes against everything political parties stand for, unless it's being united in what they believe. There's no room for independent thought.Agreed.
Both sides of the isle have pitched the word "unity" out there over the years. It doesn't exist, and thats not changing.
The parties do not want unity. They continually talk about their "base". Uniting people would shrink that base, not grow it. Unity goes against everything political parties stand for, unless it's being united in what they believe. There's no room for independent thought.
You're just describing why our system is set up this way and don't even realize it. The FF understood
Go to a popular vote and the US breaks up in 2 election cycles
No reason? We knew when we were going to have this election 150 years ago. Despite a growing sentiment of mistrust in our election process(that's a healthy outcome to accomadate the few people who refuse to use the many resources and opportunities to vote) , you still think it's the best way? Only explanation is partisanship. If you ask me, do away with mail in ballots and have a strict process of request and deadline so people go vote in person with IDs. Then it leaves very few margin to dispute.Yes, I absolutely would. We shouldn’t be making it harder to vote for no reason. Feel free to hold this against me later, I’m not Lindsey Graham
The amount of stupid in your post is astounding.Yeah why update something that was put in place 200 years ago when the landscape was completely different and the whole reason it was put in place was to ensure that slave holding states could wield as much power as the north.
The US would not break up because of this. You really think a system where the miniority rules is just? Haha
Perfect for Dem leaders. They won’t even have to pretend to care about the South or the Plains. Just campaign in LA, Chicago, and NYC. Obviously policies and laws there will make my life in rural middle TN better.Yeah a few population centers that account for the majority of the us population l. I don’t know how this is hard to understand.
It's the only options we're given by the two major political parties that control this country. The citizenry does not control the country like they should. It's basically controlled by two political entities. At some point in the history of our country, people were basically told to pick a side, and far too many people fell in line rather than continue independent thought.I don’t disagree with this. It’s the only options we’re given.
The fewer ca policies the better imoNot necessarily but I definitely am not a fan of those 43 people in Wyoming and the DAkota's collectively having 3x the representation in Senate than the 40 million Americans in California.
I may be a naive idealist but I do not believe unity would dictate less appeal to the base(s). Liberty, economic stability, a better future for our kids, peace, justice, et al....the high minded themes are shared among the majority.The parties do not want unity. They continually talk about their "base". Uniting people would shrink that base, not grow it. Unity goes against everything political parties stand for, unless it's being united in what they believe. There's no room for independent thought.
You lost me when you were wrong about why the EC was implemented.Lol pathetic. People complaining about voter fraud with no evidence at all. Let’s talk about how Biden won the popular vote by 4 million but due to electoral college - designed to give slave holding states equal power in the 1800s - we still have to wonder who won. Wonder why republicans don’t ever talk about that? A system they’ve gerrymandered to ensure the minority still has a hold on power.
How is that "clear"? You are using some of the same kind of bitter rhetoric that Democrats used four years ago. There will be investigation after investigation by Senate Republicans into the Bidens... and it will all prove something we already suspected - there really isn't much difference in the two parties. They both handle victory and defeat with the same amount of class - or lack thereof.China's little b***h will not be a legitimate president, he will have won by cheating and that's clear. I figured they would cheat but I didn't see it happening is so many different states. I will never acknowledge him as our president
Cry me a river. California has the biggest share of electoral college votes based upon their representation in Congress, which is also the largest.Not necessarily but I definitely am not a fan of those 43 people in Wyoming and the DAkota's collectively having 3x the representation in Senate than the 40 million Americans in California.
Tennessee machine prints your picks on a card and you walk over and slide it through the counter. That's all you need. The key is, at least in Pigeon Forge, you have to show your ID to enter the building and also when they check your name and address before voting.I’d be all for it, but I don’t know how you authenticate all those votes unless you make people register IP addresses or tie PINs to SS# which are randomly generated and texted at the time of vote or something. Seems like an incredible undertaking.
The amount of stupid in your post is astounding.
that would force elected officials not embrace those things which should long be gone. I find it ironic that donald embraced that and was embraced right back. McCain and Romney rejected it and was rejected too.Yeah why update something that was put in place 200 years ago when the landscape was completely different and the whole reason it was put in place was to ensure that slave holding states could wield as much power as the north.
The US would not break up because of this. You really think a system where the miniority rules is just? Haha