Orangeslice13
Shema Yisrael
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 95,292
- Likes
- 109,827
Meh, I think that the mainstream GOP NeverTrumpers are delighted about the outcome and are not going to put up much of a fight.now that the Republicans know the rules don’t matter and fraud is laughable how does everyone think they’re going to behave next election?
We need to investigate every single credible accusation of fraud. The guilty need to go to jail in the most public way possible
So, can you point to the parts before the election then? Or just speak to the investigation of election fraud, since that was the point you seemed to be accusing over.Lol. This goes a bit further back than the election.
To your second point I have a problem with any government agency, whether it be the IRS or the ATF, overstepping their boundaries. And if was at the behest of the CoC, that’s even worse.
Trump supporter: Getting rid of the filibuster and packing the Supreme Court would set a dangerous precedentLol you’re going to talk about “dangerous precedents” as a Trump supporter. Ok.
Agreed, as do the Biden voters here.now that the Republicans know the rules don’t matter and fraud is laughable how does everyone think they’re going to behave next election?
We need to investigate every single credible accusation of fraud. The guilty need to go to jail in the most public way possible
But she is our first black female vice-president...
Biden administration likely to provide US citizenship to over 500,000 Indians - Times of India
I know everyone is worried about that number and what it would change but I am not. The prescription of fraud is every bit as destructive and decisive as actual fraud.The point was it isn’t a comparable situation here. There will not be any lawsuit, or series of lawsuits, that can drag Trump over 270.
Remember when discussing voter IDs, and just the possibility of suppressing one vote was verboten. Now, who cares about all those votes that may have been cancelled by potential fraud!now that the Republicans know the rules don’t matter and fraud is laughable how does everyone think they’re going to behave next election?
We need to investigate every single credible accusation of fraud. The guilty need to go to jail in the most public way possible
I agree. But very few in power care like we do.I know everyone is worried about that number and what it would change but I am not. The prescription of fraud is every bit as destructive and decisive as actual fraud.
There are too many signed affidavits from credible people to ignore This. It has to be investigated and our election process needs to be reformed in many places
I don’t know about that. There’s been a lot of “there’s no proof” posts. When in reality the amount of proof in various locations is actually very concerning. The recounts that are actually happening could force more recounts in the places that are resisting. This is too important to the future to allow it to continueAgreed, as do the Biden voters here.
What specific ruling are you counting on the Supreme Court of the United States to make, which is going to hand over multiple states to Donald Trump (in which he is currently trailing by more than 10,000 votes) and put him over 270 electoral college votes? Keeping in mind, that Joe Biden doesn't even need to win Georgia, Arizona or Nevada. Among the states that are even competitive at all right now, Biden just needs to win Pennsylvania (he has a 45,000 vote lead) and Wisconsin (he has a 20,000 vote lead). Michigan and Minnesota are out of reach for Trump.So, you're saying that the system doesn't give the Supreme Court the powers to settle this? Is that why the Dems asked Amy Barret if she's abstain from the vote they knew was coming well before the election?
I've been predicting it goes to the Supreme Court and he wins there. You supported the impeachment of the POTUS on suspicion, innuendo, and political wrangling. But you're mourning the death of the Republic if the Supreme Court does their job. lol
Spare us.
It sounds like you don't have a firm grasp on election law or appellate process. The Supreme Court can take up any issue on certiorari. They are still bound by laws. If they chose to take up the issue, I'd be shocked because no plausible legal argument for judicial review has yet been cited by the floundering Trump team. IF (a big if) Trump came up with a legitimate gripe, the Supreme Court can hear the matter. No one can stop them. However, they'd need to have a legitimate case and controversy to decide otherwise they'd be serving an extrajudicial power grab if they simply ignored the law.Wow. That's a HUGE turn from your mourning the death of the Republic if they [did what they have right to do].
lol
Whichever you choose I suppose. Doesn’t affect me in the slightest brotha, good luck on your quest for truth!Wait ... you rewatched speech from a man that the great civil activist icon John Lewis , compared to the racist Governor of Alabama George Wallace ? So do I take your opinion of him as truth or the great icons opinion ? I’m very curious .