2020 Presidential Race

#78,977
#78,977
AM64 said:
Obviously Trump is taking over the military and gunning for the commies who stole his election - what other explanation could there be? Shouldn't have to use blue here, but well some here are that dense.
Click to expand...
Why would a higher density between the ears not correlate with higher intelligence?
 
  • Like
Reactions: GordonC and AM64
#78,978
#78,978
luthervol said:
Some unnamed sources should be believed and some should not.
The position that either all should be believed or none should be believed is ludicrous.
Click to expand...

sure but when the person of interest publicly denies the claim of the anonymous source it's hard to justify standing by the anonymous source as the "truth" of the matter. at a minimum you have to question it.

maybe here the USPS is correct even if they won't say it on the record but why would you assume the whistleblower is lying?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#78,980
#78,980
And what kind of moron, mistakes a business called "Four Seasons Total Landscaping" for the "Four Seasons Hotel"?

Nobody who is that stupid should be walking the streets.
 
#78,983
#78,983
ABINGDON VOL FAN said:
You have not seen the affidavits or know the volume. I would not say zero because neither know how the courts will view it.
Click to expand...
Lol

Trump has no path to 270, through courts or recounts. The reality was this election wasn’t that close.

His last shot will be to try and persuade GOP legislatures to just vote his electors into office in spite of the election results. We’ll see how pathetic the voter fraud arguments look when that time comes.
 
#78,986
#78,986
volinbham said:
sure but when the person of interest publicly denies the claim of the anonymous source it's hard to justify standing by the anonymous source as the "truth" of the matter. at a minimum you have to question it.

maybe here the USPS is correct even if they won't say it on the record but why would you assume the whistleblower is lying?
Click to expand...
I don't know anything about this story. Haven't followed it at all. My statement was just generic.
 
#78,987
#78,987
ABINGDON VOL FAN said:
I just gave you one regarding Esper. Be specific in what you are asking for and I will try to reply. I’m commenting in several topics at the moment.
Click to expand...

You said it happens all the time. When has the president fired a cabinet secretary, specifically high-level like defense, during the interregnum or after an election has occurred but hasn't been decided?

Edit: other than Esper.
 
#78,991
#78,991
volinbham said:
wow, solid argument getting to the heart of whether there was fraud in the election
Click to expand...
Rudy Giuliani is the President's lead attorney in trying to prove that there was voter fraud. Giuliani's stupidity and lack of integrity is highly relevant to whether or not actual incidents of fraud are uncovered and proven.

But you probably take everything Giuliani speaks as gospel don't you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJimgo, tvolsfan and OHvol40
#78,994
#78,994
BowlBrother85 said:
Rudy Giuliani is the President's lead attorney in trying to prove that there was voter fraud. Giuliani's stupidity and lack of integrity is highly relevant to whether or not actual incidents of fraud are uncovered and proven.
Click to expand...

nope - he made a mistake in a venue choice; that has no bearing on the merits of the argument.

fun to mock but irrelevant
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad and AM64
#78,995
#78,995
BowlBrother85 said:
Your "tripe" (it's an informal term for nonsense; rubbish) is never anything more than boring, long-winded Trump boot-licking.
Click to expand...
Yes I know what tripe is even when my iPhone spellcheck changes it to tribe.

Please, feel free to point where I did any “Trump boot-licking”? Oh, that’s right, I didn’t. You simply went off on another reactive trail of assumption because I don’t share your apoplectic indignation. At something.

Same old Bowl; a stranger to objectivity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave, W.TN.Orange Blood and AM64
#78,997
#78,997
BowlBrother85 said:
The burden of proof rests with those who are alleging fraudulent activity, and to this point, they have not .
Click to expand...
Neither of us know that and we will not be the ones to determine if the proof has been met. Also it doesn’t take 100% proof in order for a court to determine there may be fraudulent activity which would create a need for recounts. I believe the volume of fraudulent reports may factor into the courts decision for recounts. Plus the percentage increase of mail in votes is
Extraordinary. The court may consider that fact alone is a worry-some event that requires recounts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#79,000
#79,000
Orangeslice13 said:
It’s not lost on anyone reading along that you like the system because you get to choose to believe things you agree with and ignore the things you don’t.
I, on the other hand, don’t believe people who are not willing to attest too it very well may not exist.
Click to expand...
Sorry. FIFY.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher, RavinDave, AM64 and 1 other person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top