Orangeslice13
Shema Yisrael
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 95,112
- Likes
- 109,334
It would be extraordinary if there wasn't such an obvious reason for it. We are in the middle of a pandemic.Neither of us know that and we will not be the ones to determine if the proof has been met. Also it doesn’t take 100% proof in order for a court to determine there may be fraudulent activity which would create a need for recounts. I believe the volume of fraudulent reports may factor into the courts decision for recounts. Plus the percentage increase of mail in votes is
Extraordinary. The court may consider that fact alone is a worry-some event that requires recounts.
sure but when the person of interest publicly denies the claim of the anonymous source it's hard to justify standing by the anonymous source as the "truth" of the matter. at a minimum you have to question it.
maybe here the USPS is correct even if they won't say it on the record but why would you assume the whistleblower is lying?
With Rudy’s recent history, it’s just a piece of the puzzle tied to his credibility, acumen, and overall sense of reality (or lack thereof). Extremely relevant if he’s making unfounded claims on behalf of the president.nope - he made a mistake in a venue choice; that has no bearing on the merits of the argument.
fun to mock but irrelevant
There is turnover all the time after elections. Esper was fired , the others resigned if I read it correctly. Anyway , it’s not a serious issue and with Esper was going to happen if Trump won or lost.You said it happens all the time. When has the president fired a cabinet secretary, specifically high-level like defense, during the interregnum or after an election has occurred but hasn't been decided?
Edit: other than Esper.
Rudy Giuliani is the President's lead attorney in trying to prove that there was voter fraud. Giuliani's stupidity and lack of integrity is highly relevant to whether or not actual incidents of fraud are uncovered and proven.
But you probably take everything Giuliani speaks as gospel don't you?
With Rudy’s recent history, it’s just a piece of the puzzle tied to his credibility, acumen, and overall sense of reality (or lack thereof). Extremely relevant if he’s making unfounded claims on behalf of the president.
The pandemic excuse for mail in votes is a sham and an opportunity to conduct election irregularities. Those same people are going out to sporting activities, restaurants and many other activities which are just as or more likely to spread the virus.It would be extraordinary if there wasn't such an obvious reason for it. We are in the middle of a pandemic.
Nonsense.It’s not lost on anyone reading along that you like the system because you get to choose to believe things you agree with and ignore the things you don’t.
I, on the other hand, don’t believe people who are not willing to attest too it.
Hey Birmingham, how about we trade for a couple days? You “lick trumps boots” and I will sit in the pews and listen enraptured by the “gospel” of Pope Giuliani?Now see, this add on is complete fantasy. Go ahead and find a post where I take anything he's said as gospel.
I'll wait.
Stick to factual arguments and I won't call you out.
The pandemic excuse for mail in votes is a sham and an opportunity to conduct election irregularities. Those same people are going out to sporting activities, restaurants and many other activities which are just as or more likely to spread the virus.
Off the record I trust nobody.Nonsense.
There are people I trust. If they told me they had information but could not give me the source, I would believe them, regardless of whether or not I liked the information. There are others I do not trust at all, and would not believe anything they told me came from an unnamed source.
It's all about how much you can trust the source using an unnamed source.
She said over 200 pages, and what do they allege and with what evidence? Hint: if there were evidence, we would have already heard about it. It’s just a bunch of flailing. I know, my young kids do it all the time. If they can’t win, nobody wins.Under penalty of perjury. A signed affidavit is nothing to scoff at. She has over 200 from one county in Michigan
Sworn eyewitness testimony of voter fraud is evidence. They will have their day in court. Surely you want it to be investigated if fraud happened, right?She said over 200 pages, and what do they allege and with what evidence? Hint: if there were evidence, we would have already heard about it. It’s just a bunch of flailing. I know, my young kids do it all the time. If they can’t win, nobody wins.
I do like that you titled the statement “Nonsense” before you started. It helps the reader know what they are getting into.Nonsense.
There are people I trust. If they told me they had information but could not give me the source, I would believe them, regardless of whether or not I liked the information. There are others I do not trust at all, and would not believe anything they told me came from an unnamed source.
It's all about how much you can trust the source using an unnamed source.