2020 Presidential Race

Trump’s own lawyers went before a federal judge and admitted that there is no voter fraud. Lol this is over.

that's not what they "admitted". it was reference to a very specific instance and they are not the arbiters of whether fraud occurred or not.

I think it's insane to argue that out of over 140 million recorded votes that there is no fraud. Insane also to not try to reduce the possibility for fraud to occur.
 
I doubt there has ever been a opportunity for fraud like this election. Let me provide some ball park numbers regarding mail in votes this election compared to 2016. I looked this up over the weekend and can not verify the accuracy at this time. They are just ball park estimates.

2016 election. President votes cast = 129m est.
mail in ballots 25% or 32m est.

2020 election. President votes cast = 148m est
Mail in ballots 50% or 74m est.

An increase of 42m est or 230% in mail in votes.

I believe there is opportunity for election fraud and believe a significant amount did. It may or may not make a difference in thr winner but it certainly deserves all the attention and review necessary to insure that we have the true outcome.
Trump is up to 72m which is 3 to 4 million more than Obama’s record in 2008. Biden is around 76m which is about 7m than Obama’s previous record total.
Biden stayed in his basement the whole year until the last month. He would have a couple of hundred cars show up for his rallies. Trump was bringing in up to 56k for recent rallies. Obama stumped for Biden a couple of weeks ago and 30 people showed up. The enthusiasm variance was astounding and even the liberal networks were commenting about the lack of enthusiasm for candidate Biden. Enthusiasm for a candidate usually demonstrates or translates into votes or election turnout.

See where I’m heading with this. Something is rotten in America and this election and it’s not Trump.

So you think Obama was stumping for Joe and only drew 30 people when they were hoping for much more???

Head of promotions in a meeting the following day, "Yeah I don't know what happened, we advertised everywhere, but for some reason we could only bring 30 out for the most popular politician in the world".

That's adorable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
So you think Obama was stumping for Joe and only drew 30 people when they were hoping for much more???

Head of promotions in a meeting the following day, "Yeah I don't know what happened, we advertised everywhere, but for some reason we could only bring 30 out for the most popular politician in the world".

That's adorable.
That is what was reported. I was amused by it and also the anemic car turnouts for some of Biden’s events the last couple of weeks. One report was 200 cars with an estimated 500’people showing up beeping their horns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and StarRaider
Donald Trump is about to become the first presidential candidate to ever lose a state by 5 million votes (California). They definitely aren't feeling the love for the Cheeto in The Golden State.
In 2016 Clinton beat Trump by 6m in California and New York combined. Trump beat Clinton by 3m in the other 48 states so Clinton won the total
vote count by 3m. This is the reason we have an electoral college. The candidates would only have to campaign in the 2 or 3 largest states to win the election and would not care about the other states. Our founder fathers were pretty smart when they setup the electoral college. Their understanding and knowledge was greater than 99.9% of US citizens today.
 
In 2016 Clinton beat Trump by 6m in California and New York combined. Trump beat Clinton by 3m in the other 48 states so Clinton won the total
vote count by 3m. This is the reason we have an electoral college. The candidates would only have to campaign in the 2 or 3 largest states to win the election and would not care about the other states. Our founder fathers were pretty smart when they setup the electoral college. Their understanding and knowledge was greater than 99.9% of US citizens today.
Math is a struggle for those with a lib fart degree
 
Just to create drama about Senate control they could have called that as soon as the polls closed View attachment 322223

If 69% is of total votes then the D challenger needs 75% of the remaining vote. If it's percent of precincts and the ones not reporting are heavily D then maybe there's a chance but it's seems nuts that this one can't be called with 69% in.
 
Divided government is my fave I'm guessing 223-212 and Senate 51-49 after runoffs
Let’s hope. Hate to see Dems control everything. I bet Republicans take the house back easily in 2022 as the Biden/Harris administration slides into mediocrity. I expect the AOC gang will disrupt and cause major riffs with Pelosi and the House dems in the next two years.
 
In 2016 Clinton beat Trump by 6m in California and New York combined. Trump beat Clinton by 3m in the other 48 states so Clinton won the total
vote count by 3m. This is the reason we have an electoral college. The candidates would only have to campaign in the 2 or 3 largest states to win the election and would not care about the other states. Our founder fathers were pretty smart when they setup the electoral college. Their understanding and knowledge was greater than 99.9% of US citizens today.
All of this from "The candidate would only have to ..." to the end of your post is 100% false.
 
If 69% is of total votes then the D challenger needs 75% of the remaining vote. If it's percent of precincts and the ones not reporting are heavily D then maybe there's a chance but it's seems nuts that this one can't be called with 69% in.
He would have to take about 27/31 to catch and pass or about 87% by my calculations. I’m not counting the 3rd ticket in my calculations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolnJC

VN Store



Back
Top