VolforFootball
I like pizza
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2018
- Messages
- 3,746
- Likes
- 4,638
And as for your last sentence, all the states mattered when it came to ratifying the Constitution. Joining the Union was not mandatory, it was voluntary. It wasn't as if the FFs could have written whatever they wanted and the populace would just have to live with it. The people in each state had to agree to it.Actually the small state/big state issue was only part of it. Slavery was another. These were complex things, but even you brought up the 3/5 compromise which is directly tied to the EC. Like it or not, slavery was something that factored into the decision to create the EC. Without it the southern states wouldn’t have enough eligible citizens to matter.
It depends on preferred implementation methods, but either nationally through IRS records, social security records or census records; or locally through another record-keeping method every eligible voter is passively registered.
This is inaccurate. The question of how slaves would be counted didn't come up until after the EC had been agreed upon. And again, the EC was a compromise. One side wanted the legislators to choose the President, and one side wanted popular vote. So they compromised and created the EC. It's how the Constitution was created, through compromise. The FFs created a system of government that they could then take back to their individual states and sell as something worth ratifying. Each state had to feel like they were getting a fair deal. It took 9 states ratifying the Constitution to go into effect, and if a state were to choose not to ratify, they wouldn't have been part of the Union. Each state joined willingly. Yes, slavery came to effect the EC, but the EC was not created because of slavery. That's just historically wrong.
Louder was right it’s still required. And I don’t care one way or another on compulsory registration other than it’s heavy handed. I don’t see a valid mechanism for automatic. Even social security requires active registration.
This isn’t that hard
I’ve got no problem with tying compulsory registration to your DL or state ID for those who have that instead. Compare the state DLID and voter logs and mail notices of non compliance. I mean ... if that’s what you guys really want. Seems like over reach though.Maybe not hard, but some universal standard would be a good start. Only thing I've ever needed was my Driver's License, but some uniformity would go a long way here.
Which is why the three states that were actively still importing slaves threatened to walk away if slavery was outlawed. They would continue this experiment of trying to hold the rest of the country hostage on account of slavery for another 80 years or so.And as for your last sentence, all the states mattered when it came to ratifying the Constitution. Joining the Union was not mandatory, it was voluntary. It wasn't as if the FFs could have written whatever they wanted and the populace would just have to live with it. The people in each state had to agree to it.
I would argue it's a very similar argument in that both acts are for the public welfare.
Imagine someone trying to sell this idea as an individual.I don't care about you argument.
SS is a ****-show that forcibly took money out of my paycheck with the promise of guaranteeing my welfare after retirement, and I will see no return because it was a Ponze scheme that the gov't mismanaged into bankruptcy.
You're standing it up as some paragon of brilliant policy. SMH.
That’s how you currently do it. You understand we are taking about a change, right?