golfballs
Mostly Peaceful Poster
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2009
- Messages
- 75,414
- Likes
- 57,659
It was pretty clear that the mini-tantrum and refusing to certify was the unprecedented part in all this. Audits are not unprecedented in any way, shape, or form.Even the canvassers commented that this current certification state was unprecedented. Do I need to go get you a definition of that word Carlos?
Actually no. I’ve posted I think links to two articles now from local Detroit papers. Like it or not they had valid concerns on the accuracy of the voter logs and polling data. They had every right to protest certification and there was no damn reason for the Dems to not want to certify. If you want to play the partisan card make sure you call out the Dems for brushing them aside and trying to force it thru also.It was pretty clear that the mini-tantrum and refusing to certify was the unprecedented part in all this.
I’d guess the tallying machines keep local sums that are then offloaded to a memory card and uploaded to a central database. Admittedly just a guess.Well now I'm confused again... what is this memory card stuff? It goes back to my original question of how do you hand count a digital vote?
“Engineer” tears third hole in paper bag. Still can’t find his way out.
What is the certification process (other than a third hole in your paper bag)?
I’m pretty sure Georgia had what are commonly referred to as paper ballots. The SOS has commented on it being the first time in 20 years for them to use paper ballots.
Well now I'm confused again... what is this memory card stuff? It goes back to my original question of how do you hand count a digital vote?
I’ve had about two lawyers tell me at least why they hate us. We are trained critical thinkers and data driven. We can process evidence fairly well on our own. If needed we asked pointed amplification questions. We scare them because we are less open to suggestion basically. Anecdotally for those two at leastI really enjoy going back and forth with you, but we do vary wildly on how we see things sometimes. I worked with a lawyer once and he would explain how courts would come to a legal decision, and I would say WTH. He used to tell me their engineer jokes, too. I guess the difference is we deal with physical law, and you deal with whatever strangeness you call it law. I've had an introductory law course and a couple on product liability, and from what I learned we'll never agree. The one where the clown picks up a lawnmower to trim his hedge and loses some fingers in the process is one of those where the twain will never meet. We look at it as you can't fix stupid, but one of your guys won the lawsuit for the guy with the missing digits.
I’m pretty sure I read all the contested states have a paper ballot back up. Makes this whole Dominion conspiracy all the more worthless.
Won’t matter though. They will never be convinced a President that hovered around 42-44% approval his entire term lost in a fair election.
It depends on the case, not the lawyer.I’ve had about two lawyers tell me at least why they hate us. We are trained critical thinkers and data driven. We can process evidence fairly well on our own. If needed we asked pointed amplification questions. We scare them because we are less open to suggestion basically. Anecdotally for those two at least
We had paper ballots here. After ya fill it out, it goes into a scanner, which you do yourself.
That doesn't say much for the mentality of the losing side. This was not a particularly close election. The electoral college vote totals are projected to be the same now as they were in 2016 (306 to 232). Donald Trump has often referred to his 2016 electoral college margin of victory as being a "landslide".No matter which way this goes, it’s going to get real ugly in America.
I really enjoy going back and forth with you, but we do vary wildly on how we see things sometimes. I worked with a lawyer once and he would explain how courts would come to a legal decision, and I would say WTH. He used to tell me their engineer jokes, too. I guess the difference is we deal with physical law, and you deal with whatever strangeness you call it law. I've had an introductory law course and a couple on product liability, and from what I learned we'll never agree. The one where the clown picks up a lawnmower to trim his hedge and loses some fingers in the process is one of those where the twain will never meet. We look at it as you can't fix stupid, but one of your guys won the lawsuit for the guy with the missing digits.
And yet here you are saying that a bunch of engineers from Georgia Tech couldn’t/didn’t devise and run simple tests to certify/audit their equipment based on the word of a lawyer and her notoriously dishonest client.