2020 Presidential Race

#90,776
#90,776
tnmarktx said:
You probably watch only state run media. There is systematic fraud in this election statistical impossibilities alone are proof. Is the theft of an election reason enough to "load your guns"? There's never been a time in my life like this to consider it.
Click to expand...

You know, bringing 500 hundred manipulated videos, doesn't make them un-manipulated.
I took debate class, so respect the technique. But using qualifiers like "you know there is", "has to be" and "moron not to believe" doesn't make it true.

Twice, a president willing to abuse every department of Gov't, has launched a full on assault, with every resource known to man, to produce proof of voter fraud. If it was all over the place as claimed, think at least 1 attempt would have produced real, upheld in Republican courts, evidence.
 
#90,777
#90,777
And no, I don't just watched one version of media. Usually up at 4am running thru them all, with an open mind.
Something I wish more people did.
 
#90,780
#90,780
Orangeslice13 said:
so you will stand up against a National mask mandate?
Bidens racist gun tax bill that’s a direct assault oN the constitution? (9th circuit has already ruled it so)
The calls from Democrats to eliminate the EC by Ex Order (another direct assult on the constitution)

Or are you going to pretend this Trump guy is somehow new in his assault on liberty because he’s a schmuck?

right now most of the guys on the right (on VN) are saying let it play out in court. If you don’t see some real head scratching problems with what happened in this election then you’ve got partisan blinders on
Click to expand...

No matter how many different ways it's phrased, I've already answered using an instance of a dem doing this or that as justification for people calling themselves Republican, supporting completely anti Republican acts.
Joe may very well piss me off, God knows Pelosi does constantly, I will not use that as excuse or justification.

Mask mandate? Like force people to wear one everywhere? - no.
If you mean having to wear one in federal buildings/ property for a set time? I don't care.
It's a temporary health measure on federal property. Don't see anyone protesting a law against people smoking a cigarette in a federal courthouse. A measure installed to protect other's health but permanent. Not gonna pretend it's completely different and delve into faux outrage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
#90,782
#90,782
headhunter15 said:


Agree with this statement.
Click to expand...

Not sure I follow the logic of this.

The so-called "fake news" (which trumpers claim is anything that is main stream media) has been around for decades, yet the divisiveness we see today has only seemingly been heightened in the last decade. What has come into existence in the last decade in terms of media and personality that wasn't around for the many decades prior?
 
#90,783
#90,783
Oh, 2nd amendment. I've always fully supported and will continue.
The only part I differ from most Republicans is acknowledging the validity of *certain* debates.
The FF's made the intent clear.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State".
They couldn't have imagined in their sickest imaginations, that psychopaths would abuse the right to gun down children.
If they could imagine that kind of evil, there's a possibility they might have kept the right but potentially added a safeguard against pure evils.
But they could not even dream of such psychopathic behavior, no one at that time could. So they didn't add safeguards.
As a result, I stand behind it as written.
But also acknowledge their real intent, they made that part clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stew Cook
#90,786
#90,786
Orangeslice13 said:
It’s also reasonable to continue to point out what a cluster flub this election was in an effort to reform the process. We went in the wrong direction after 2016. Time to correct those errors. Because now that it’s been shown how easy it is to attack the voting system then you can guarantee that someone will in 2024
Click to expand...
Don’t disagree slice. This whole situation is a cluster f$&@
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#90,791
#90,791
Poll of the week: A new Gallup poll finds that President-elect Joe Biden has a 55% favorable rating and a 41% unfavorable rating.
The same poll gives President Donald Trump a 42% favorable rating and a 57% unfavorable rating.

Indeed, Biden is more popular than Trump has been at any point since he started running for president in June 2015.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, ohhbother and lostsheep
#90,792
#90,792
#90,793
#90,793
#90,794
#90,794
chargervol said:
Oh, 2nd amendment. I've always fully supported and will continue.
The only part I differ from most Republicans is acknowledging the validity of *certain* debates.
The FF's made the intent clear.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State".
They couldn't have imagined in their sickest imaginations, that psychopaths would abuse the right to gun down children.
If they could imagine that kind of evil, there's a possibility they might have kept the right but potentially added a safeguard against pure evils.
But they could not even dream of such psychopathic behavior, no one at that time could. So they didn't add safeguards.
As a result, I stand behind it as written.
But also acknowledge their real intent, they made that part clear.
Click to expand...

Psychopathic behavior and violence against children both existed in the 18th century. Neither of those is new.
 
#90,795
#90,795
chargervol said:
Oh, 2nd amendment. I've always fully supported and will continue.
The only part I differ from most Republicans is acknowledging the validity of *certain* debates.
The FF's made the intent clear.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State".
They couldn't have imagined in their sickest imaginations, that psychopaths would abuse the right to gun down children.
If they could imagine that kind of evil, there's a possibility they might have kept the right but potentially added a safeguard against pure evils.
But they could not even dream of such psychopathic behavior, no one at that time could. So they didn't add safeguards.
As a result, I stand behind it as written.
But also acknowledge their real intent, they made that part clear.
Click to expand...
Murder has always been illegal. If you commit murder you are held accountable. And no I’m pretty sure our FF would have stood unified against thought police too.

And honestly if you’re leaning on militia as the intent no it went right over your head.
 
#90,796
#90,796
clarksvol00 said:
Some context on the Antrim County, MI claims is below. If I'm reading this correctly Trump already won that county and the lawsuit doesn't deal with the presidential election. It's about a marijuana referendum.

Giuliani claims win over Antrim judge's order related to pot proposal
Click to expand...
There is likely more to this. I don't see Giuliani and team waisting time on doing a full-blown forensic analysis getting information related to the marijuana referendum vote count.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top