All of these cases were tossed on technicalities, dumbass ones at that. They were not tossed because they couldn't be proven. MSNBC/CNN don't tell radical leftists like bowl this
Just like people saying the election was stolen wasnt proof. Just like redit circulating some chart with no back up isnt proof. Just like saying no audit is proof.NPR saying they have seen proof isn't proof it's a report and likely a fake one
Ratensperger saying people have threatened him isn't proof.
Biden is such a pathetic a-hole....
Biden says Democratic victories in Georgia Senate runoffs would lead to $2,000 stimulus checks
Whatever you think of the electors, Pence has no authority to "reject" any of them.
You first have to prove that such a vote was fraudulent to begin with. Simply saying it, does not make it so. In the words of Judge Stephanos Bibas, from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (who was appointed to the bench by President Donald Trump) :
"Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
-- Judge Stepanos Bibas, from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, a Trump appointee, while dismissing a case brought forth by legal representatives of the 2020 Trump Campaign.
Why do you assume that is the case. If I was threatening you I would stop and act peaceful when the police arrived. I'm not saying that is what happened,but you are willing to say he is in the wrong without any proof. What in antifa's past makes you think it was a peaceful gathering?He could have made a reasonable point about people gathering in front of his house. But instead embellish what happened to whip up more outrage.
It was recorded.Why do you assume that is the case. If I was threatening you I would stop and act peaceful when the police arrived. I'm not saying that is what happened,but you are willing to say he is in the wrong without any proof. What in antifa's past makes you think it was a peaceful gathering?
But they claim to have proof except when asked to show it in court. If that proof doesn't include data and information then what is it exactly?
I guess he could throw all the certificates in a trash can and light it on fire, but what would that accomplish?Seems like Pence swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. If he felt that the election was conducted in such a way that it cannot be reconciled with the Constitution, then it would seem he'd have to make a decision on which way to go.
Someone can have allegations of impropriety; but if they don't have actual access to machines and votes, they don't have proof. What if your neighbor kidnapped your daughter, and you knew, but you couldn't legally get inside his house to take pictures etc to provide proof? This is all about access to ballots and machines.