luthervol
rational (x) and reasonable (y)
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2016
- Messages
- 46,919
- Likes
- 20,008
Seems to work counter to your claim. (You view Perdue as best yet see him as being attacked the least.)How would you know if the attacks are 50-50. Confirmation bias. You are pro Ossof/Warnock so you are going to notice the attacks on them more than you notice the attacks on Perdue/Loeffler. You just nod your head to those and move on.
From my observation Loeffler was attacked the most. Warnock and Ossof were close second and third. Didnt see much against Perdue. Which fits my confirmation bias because Perdue is the only one worth a sh*t, which isnt much, but there it is.
But you are half right - he was attacked the least.
btw....I've never claimed to be unbiased, I'm smart enough to realize that no one is.