2022 U.S. Senate Races

No republicans that are ok with MTG have a leg to stand on when complaining about the Democrats.
No Democrat that’s ok with AOC has a leg to stand on when complaining about republicans.

Straight garbage. All of them.
MTG is nowhere near as extreme as AOC and some democrats. Plus AOC has sold out completely to the corporate wing of the democrat party.

Since we are on the subject. Who are some politicians you like?
 
The bad choices that Rs made in nominating for statewide elections (i.e governor or Senate) trickled down to the rest of the ticket to the House races.

See Arizona, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Colorado.

The fact that two more years of Speaker Pelosi is a possibility should make Rs sick but some are too busy on their knees at Trump to care....
The next two years are going to suck …. It might be best not to be in charge.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 825VOL
MTG is nowhere near as extreme as AOC and some democrats. Plus AOC has sold out completely to the corporate wing of the democrat party.

Since we are on the subject. Who are some politicians you like?

MTG and the Rocky Mountain Barbie are as extreme, if not moreso, as AOC and the Squad. None of these types are good for the country....
 
I never mentioned a number of Senate seats that Republicans were supposed to win ....

You are being dishonest in suggesting that Republicans didn't expect to beat John Fetterman in Pennsylvania. You couldn't have hoped for a weaker candidate to run against. That was a layup for Republicans, but because you have to nominate whoever Trump wants - you went with Dr. Oz and missed a wide-open layup. Thanks. LOL.
Strange. The projections I saw all showed Fetterman with a lead up until a few polls in literally the last couple of days. The momentum was definitely with Oz and a lot of hope he might pull it out, but there were very few I follow who, as you claim, "expected" Oz to win. He was a poor choice. Yeah, you're right, he got the nom because of Trump and maybe all the Trump folks thought he would win...don't know.

I did get get caught with the momentum in the last few days and thought the Rs would win the Senate, but alas, I was wrong. It happens.
 
Strange. The projections I saw all showed Fetterman with a lead up until a few polls in literally the last couple of days. The momentum was definitely with Oz and a lot of hope he might pull it out, but there were very few I follow who, as you claim, "expected" Oz to win. He was a poor choice. Yeah, you're right, he got the nom because of Trump and maybe all the Trump folks thought he would win...don't know.

I did get get caught with the momentum in the last few days and thought the Rs would win the Senate, but alas, I was wrong. It happens.
Even many Trump supporters and what people would consider the "MAGA" crowd were upset with his endorsement of Oz. Kathy Barnette would have been the much better choice. But I think it came down to the 2 older white men in the primary - Oz and McCormick.
 
Last edited:
MTG and the Rocky Mountain Barbie are as extreme, if not moreso, as AOC and the Squad. None of these types are good for the country....
"These types". Can you clarify that statement a little bit more?

I think you guys and gals are getting a little too caught up in how the media are portraying these people. Not saying any of those 3 you mentioned are perfect but nobody in this thread is either. Or any better for that matter.
 
Even many Trump supporters and what people would consider the "MAGA" crowd were upset with his endorsement of Oz. Kathy Barnette would have been the much better choice. But I think it came down to the 2 older white men in the primary - Oz and McCormick.
Yes. I thought Oz was not the best choice as well based on things I read. Trump was more interested in perceived loyalty than electability.
 
"These types". Can you clarify that statement a little bit more?

I think you guys and gals are getting a little too caught up in how the media are portraying these people. Not saying any of those 3 you mentioned are perfect but nobody in this thread is either. Or any better for that matter.

These types = hyper partisan hack
 
"These types". Can you clarify that statement a little bit more?

I think you guys and gals are getting a little too caught up in how the media are portraying these people. Not saying any of those 3 you mentioned are perfect but nobody in this thread is either. Or any better for that matter.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is on video advocating for the credibility of Q Anon and the multitude of theories that followers believe.

There is also video of her comparing mask mandates during the COVID pandemic to the Nazi's forcing Jews to wear yellow star badges.

You name the conspiracy theory, and chances are she has plugged it either on social media or during interviews. That isn't media spin. That's just who she is.
 
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is on video advocating for the credibility of Q Anon and the multitude of theories that followers believe.

There is also video of her comparing mask mandates during the COVID pandemic to the Nazi's forcing Jews to wear yellow star badges.

You name the conspiracy theory, and chances are she has plugged it, either on social media or during interviews. That isn't media spin. That's just who she is.
I bet you had no problem with multiple conspiracy theories regarding Trump or any other Republican that were proven false over the past 6 years.

I bet you also had no problem with mask or vaccine mandates either.

Your political party thrives on conspiracy theories, segregation, and hyper partisanship. There's a reason your president Joe Biden had mentors like James Eastland.
 
I bet you had no problem with multiple conspiracy theories regarding Trump or any other Republican that were proven false over the past 6 years.

I bet you also had no problem with mask or vaccine mandates either.

Your political party thrives on conspiracy theories, segregation, and hyper partisanship. There's a reason your president Joe Biden had mentors like James Eastland.
I don't support vaccine mandates, but mask mandates issued at the state level during the pandemic? Yes.

You would have to specify what theory you are referring to in regards to Trump, before I could respond to that. I do believe, based on the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump between the leadership of the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, that Trump sought after dirt on Hillary Clinton from Russian agents .... but I would also acknowledge that there is no proof that any such material ever changed hands.

The two party's are not comparable when it comes to the sheer volume of conspiracy theories or in their devoted following ... Q Anon became a cultural phenomenon ... so did PizzaGate.

Do you really want to defend what a kook MTG is? That's a strange hill to die on.
 
Strange. The projections I saw all showed Fetterman with a lead up until a few polls in literally the last couple of days. The momentum was definitely with Oz and a lot of hope he might pull it out, but there were very few I follow who, as you claim, "expected" Oz to win. He was a poor choice. Yeah, you're right, he got the nom because of Trump and maybe all the Trump folks thought he would win...don't know.

I did get get caught with the momentum in the last few days and thought the Rs would win the Senate, but alas, I was wrong. It happens.
Basically, all of Fox News and most right-wing pundits did. I have posted videos that show this.
 
I don't support vaccine mandates, but mask mandates issued at the state level during the pandemic? Yes.

You would have to specify what theory you are referring to in regards to Trump, before I could respond to that. I do believe, based on the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump between the leadership of the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, that Trump sought after dirt on Hillary Clinton from Russian agents .... but I would also acknowledge that there is no proof that any such material ever changed hands.

The two party's are not comparable when it comes to the sheer volume of conspiracy theories or in their devoted following ... Q Anon became a cultural phenomenon ... so did PizzaGate.
If you don't support vaccine mandates then I hope you are reaching out to the people in your party who support such nonsense.

What scientific proof do you have that mask mandates actually work? For example, is it healthy for a manufacturing worker to wear a mask during their entire 12 hour shift? Mask mandates are also totalitarian in nature. If you are against totalitarianism then you should also be against mask mandates.

Yes the democrat party has their own share of conspiracy theories. Russian collusion, Antifa being only an idea, and not to mention the selective outrage over political violence. And let's not forget the constant censorship that not only your party pushes but many of their followers do as well. And how many different news stories about Trump came out that actually were proven to be false?
 

VN Store



Back
Top