2022 U.S. Senate Races

If you don't support vaccine mandates then I hope you are reaching out to the people in your party who support such nonsense.

What scientific proof do you have that mask mandates actually work? For example, is it healthy for a manufacturing worker to wear a mask during their entire 12 hour shift? Mask mandates are also totalitarian in nature. If you are against totalitarianism then you should also be against mask mandates.

Yes the democrat party has their own share of conspiracy theories. Russian collusion, Antifa being only an idea, and not to mention the selective outrage over political violence. And let's not forget the constant censorship that not only your party pushes but many of their followers do as well. And how many different news stories about Trump came out that actually were proven to be false?
Collusion between Russian agents and the 2016 Trump campaign, was a theory, but it wasn't completely unfounded. The 2016 meeting at Trump Tower did take place and both Trump and Trump Jr lied about what was discussed and who was in attendance at the meeting. I guess that can still pass as a conspiracy theory, but it wasn't a made from scratch theory like PizzaGate.

One person, Joe Biden, saying that ANTIFA is an idea, not an organization, does not make for a conspiracy theory. It's an ignorant thing to say, but that doesn't make it a conspiracy theory. Neither is selective outrage over rioting or censorship.

Do you even understand what a conspiracy theory is? It doesn't look like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
Collusion between Russian agents and the 2016 Trump campaign, was a theory, but it wasn't completely unfounded. The 2016 meeting at Trump Tower did take place and both Trump and Trump Jr lied about what was discussed and who was in attendance at the meeting. I guess that can still pass as a conspiracy theory, but it wasn't a made from scratch theory like PizzaGate.

One person, Joe Biden, saying that ANTIFA is an idea, not an organization, does not make for a conspiracy theory. It's an ignorant thing to say, but that doesn't make it a conspiracy theory. Neither is selective outrage over rioting or censorship.

Do you even understand what a conspiracy theory is? It doesn't look like it.
What you're doing is focusing only on the "approved" conspiracy theories as set out by your preferred media sources and political party.

Russian collusion was a conspiracy theory. And many democrats denied for years that Antifa existed even though there was overwhelming proof that it did. Even trying to say it was a conspiracy theory from Republicans.

And we can also get into the comments that your politicians, in particular, made about unvaccinated individuals more recently.
 
What you're doing is focusing only on the "approved" conspiracy theories as set out by your preferred media sources and political party.

Russian collusion was a conspiracy theory. And many democrats denied for years that Antifa existed even though there was overwhelming proof that it did. Even trying to say it was a conspiracy theory from Republicans.

And we can also get into the comments that your politicians, in particular, made about unvaccinated individuals more recently.
You aren't showing an understanding of what a conspiracy theory is. Like I said, you can count Russian collusion with the 2016 Trump campaign if you want to ... but it didn't come from nowhere. E-mails between Rob Goldstone (who arranged the Trump Tower meeting) and Donald Trump Jr. clearly show that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss dirt on Hillary Clinton. Actual events leant themselves to speculation concerning Russian interference in the election - which may have also included collusion. An investigation didn't turn up any proof, but that is hardly the same thing as PizzaGate, which was an entirely fabricated story.
 
You aren't showing an understanding of what a conspiracy theory is. Like I said, you can count Russian collusion with the 2016 Trump campaign if you want to ... but it didn't come from nowhere. E-mails between Rob Goldstone (who arranged the Trump Tower meeting) and Donald Trump Jr. clearly show that the purpose of the meeting was to discuss dirt on Hillary Clinton. Actual events leant themselves to speculation concerning Russian interference in the election - which may have also included collusion. An investigation didn't turn up any proof, but that is hardly the same thing as PizzaGate, which was an entirely fabricated story.
Lol. You really just only repeat what you hear from your preferred media.

I'm beginning to think you are scared of Trump running again. Because you know that in reality a Mitch McConnell lead Republican Party or McConnell preferred candidate is much much better for democrats than a party lead by Trump.

I suggest you read that last article I posted too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
That is a ridiculous article which gives Trump credit for the Republicans winning elections in red states/districts that were never competitive. If you only count the elections in battleground states, where Trump also held rallies and campaigned in-person ... he lost the majority of them. That is a fact.
 
Lol. You really just only repeat what you hear from your preferred media.

I'm beginning to think you are scared of Trump running again. Because you know that in reality a Mitch McConnell lead Republican Party or McConnell preferred candidate is much much better for democrats than a party lead by Trump.

I suggest you read that last article I posted too.
How do you know what I hear from the damn media? LOL. That is such a stupid presumption.

I'm the opposite of scared of Trump. I hope he runs. He would lose ... DeSantis would probably win.
 
That is a ridiculous article which gives Trump credit for the Republicans winning elections in red states/districts that were never competitive. If you only count the elections in battleground states, where Trump also held rallies and campaigned in-person ... he lost the majority of them. That is a fact.
It looks like you ignored every other point made in the article. But I guess you're going to ignore the fact that Trump endorsed candidates went 219-16. How did Biden endorsed candidates do? Even Tennessee district 5 has flipped completely red. Only one blue area in the state now and that is represented by that nut Steve Cohen.

Let's face reality. You want Mitch to be leader of the Republican Party because you know it's more favorable for democrats.
 
It looks like you ignored every other point made in the article. But I guess you're going to ignore the fact that Trump endorsed candidates went 219-16. How did Biden endorsed candidates do? Even Tennessee district 5 has flipped completely red. Only one blue area in the state now and that is represented by that nut Steve Cohen.

Let's face reality. You want Mitch to be leader of the Republican Party because you know it's more favorable for democrats.

Tennessee District 5 was gerrymandered red...it didn't flip red...
 
It flipped red. And like I said there is only democrat house rep for the state and it's that crazy nut Cohen.

The Republican led legislature redraw the lines in such obscene ways where Distict 5 became red.....

(And yes, the Dems do the same thing in states where they control the legislature)
 
It looks like you ignored every other point made in the article. But I guess you're going to ignore the fact that Trump endorsed candidates went 219-16. How did Biden endorsed candidates do? Even Tennessee district 5 has flipped completely red. Only one blue area in the state now and that is represented by that nut Steve Cohen.

Let's face reality. You want Mitch to be leader of the Republican Party because you know it's more favorable for democrats.
Like I said, that includes practically every Republican candidate for office, even though Trump did NOT endorse all of them, nor did he campaign for most of them. He endorsed and campaigned primarily for Kari Lake (losing), Herschel Walker (runoff), Tudor Dixon (lost), Dr. Mehmet Oz (lost), Doug Mastriano (lost), Sarah Palin (lost), Blake Masters (lost).
 
It looks like you ignored every other point made in the article. But I guess you're going to ignore the fact that Trump endorsed candidates went 219-16. How did Biden endorsed candidates do? Even Tennessee district 5 has flipped completely red. Only one blue area in the state now and that is represented by that nut Steve Cohen.

Let's face reality. You want Mitch to be leader of the Republican Party because you know it's more favorable for democrats.
There is nothing more favorable for Democrats than Trump running for President, and campaigning in close elections for his fellow Republicans.... he does nothing but lose.
 
Basically, all of Fox News and most right-wing pundits did. I have posted videos that show this.
I am not wasting my time watching some cherry-picked videos. I just went through the election season and do not need someone with obvious bias like you telling me what I did and did not see.
 
I am not wasting my time watching some cherry-picked videos. I just went through the election season and do not need someone with obvious bias like you telling me what I did and did not see.
I did not tell you what you saw, Genius.

I'm telling you that Fox News hosts and their pundits over-hyped a "red wave" which included a victory for Oz in Pennsylvania.... because they did and there is video proof of it. It's not cherry-picking when you have literally the entire network (with the exception of Geraldo Rivera) doing it!
 
Like I said, that includes practically every Republican candidate for office, even though Trump did NOT endorse all of them, nor did he campaign for most of them. He endorsed and campaigned primarily for Kari Lake (losing), Herschel Walker (runoff), Tudor Dixon (lost), Dr. Mehmet Oz (lost), Doug Mastriano (lost), Sarah Palin (lost), Blake Masters (lost).
It sounds like you are jealous of the 93% success rate of Trump endorsed candidates. What's the success rate of Biden endorsed candidates?

At least Warnock is smart enough to keep your man Biden away from his campaign.
 
I did not tell you what you saw, Genius.

I'm telling you that Fox News hosts and their pundits over-hyped a "red wave" which included a victory for Oz in Pennsylvania.... because they did and there is video proof of it. It's not cherry-picking when you have literally the entire network (with the exception of Geraldo Rivera) doing it!
Hate to break the news to you, but most everyone in the news i saw on both sides thought there was a good chance of a red wave. Didn't happen.
 
Mark Levin: Here's why the 'red wave' was never really going to happen

"I noticed that many of the same people who were wrong about a red wave are now telling us what to think about a non-red wave. The experts, the consultants, the ruling class, the media, the politicians. We need to think for ourselves, enough of the static," the host said over the weekend. "I said before the election, and I said repeatedly here and on radio: Forget about the red wave. Forget about a red tsunami. Forget about Armageddon and vote."

In the Senate, Republicans had to defend 20 of the 34 seats up for re-election. To win the majority, Republicans would have had to "tap into" the 14 Democrat incumbent seats, the host explained.

"That was a tall hill to climb. And this is one of the reasons I wasn't on this red-wave bandwagon so fast," he said. "I needed to think about it. 2024. This is the key. The next election cycle, 33 seats are up. Now, listen to this. Two-thirds of them are Democrat seats. So the Democrats have to defend 23 Senate seats. The Republicans have to defend only ten."


"So," he continued, "the math in 2022 never really led to a red wave possibility and the math in 2024, it does lead to a red wave possibility. Does that mean there will be one? Of course not. But I'm just explaining the math, the simple math. We had about 60% of the seats up. They have almost 70% of the seats up in the next round. So what does that mean? Democrats needed to have some serious gains in the Senate last week to stave off a disaster in 2024. They failed miserably."
 
Democrats needed to have some serious gains in the Senate last week to stave off a disaster in 2024. They failed miserably."
This last line is ridiculous.

The party in power, never makes "serious gains" in either chamber of Congress during a mid-term election cycle. With the Georgia runoff pending, Democrats have thus far, won every Senate election that they had a realistic chance of winning. It is rare for the party in power to gain a Senate seat in the mid-terms, but that will happen if Warnock defeats Walker in the Georgia runoff. Mark Levin knows that, and he never addresses the fact that Democrats managed to hold off this red wave by running several weak candidates and at a time when all of the political head winds were against them (the economy, crime, border security). He reveals his own bias with such tripe. That is pure spin, with zero accountability. The Republicans just blew it.
 
Mitch McConell blew it. That is why I am for term limits . If democrats and republicans could get together , primary these dinosaurs out and replace them with candidates pledged to vote term limits in we would all be in a better place. America literally votes for people that refuse to come to the table and compromise. The leadership doesn't love or care about Americans. They love the game.
 

VN Store



Back
Top