2024 Presidential Race

[luthervol]

No you didn't. I asked you for like a half a day why Trump was so horrible, the only thing you really came back with was he said, "lock her up"

Sure I did. Go back and read my posts from 8 years ago. It will be entertaining.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Sure I did. Go back and read my posts from 8 years ago. It will be entertaining.

You sure did. Why would I have to go back and read your posts from 8 years ago. I asked you over several hours why you have TDS, the best you came up with was he said, "Lock her up". Which is what he should have done.

 

[Buddy’s Bandit]

I thought walls did not work?



AHHH…..but now they do!

 

[MontyPython]

For all those wanting to know why you shouldn't vote for Trump, here it is IMO.


"Retired federal appeals court Judge J. Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative legal scholar put on the bench by President George H.W. Bush, is endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris over former President Donald Trump, whose candidacy he describes as an existential threat to American democracy.

It will be the first time Luttig, a veteran of two Republican administrations, has voted for a Democrat.

“In the presidential election of 2024 there is only one political party and one candidate for the presidency that can claim the mantle of defender and protector of America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law,” Luttig wrote in a statement obtained exclusively by CNN. “As a result, I will unhesitatingly vote for the Democratic Party’s candidate for the Presidency of the United States, Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris.”

Luttig played a now famous role in persuading then-Vice President Mike Pence to defy Trump and certify the 2020 presidential election. In a series of tweets drafted at the request of Pence’s attorney, Luttig spelled out in stark terms the legal rationale for Pence to reject the former president’s attempt to overturn Joe Biden’s victory.

Since then, Luttig has emerged as a preeminent constitutional critic of Trump. In endorsing Harris, Luttig argues that partisan distinctions must, in this election, be set aside in order to prevent the “singularly unfit” Trump from returning to the White House.

“In voting for Vice President Harris, I assume that her public policy views are vastly different from my own,” Luttig writes, “but I am indifferent in this election as to her policy views on any issues other than America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law, as I believe all Americans should be.”

 

[BigOrangeMojo]

I thought walls did not work?



AHHH…..but now they do!

You put up the walls and paint them all a shade of gray

 

[hog88]

For all those wanting to know why you shouldn't vote for Trump, here it is.

About as simple and black and white as they come...


"Retired federal appeals court Judge J. Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative legal scholar put on the bench by President George H.W. Bush, is endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris over former President Donald Trump, whose candidacy he describes as an existential threat to American democracy.

It will be the first time Luttig, a veteran of two Republican administrations, has voted for a Democrat.

“In the presidential election of 2024 there is only one political party and one candidate for the presidency that can claim the mantle of defender and protector of America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law,” Luttig wrote in a statement obtained exclusively by CNN. “As a result, I will unhesitatingly vote for the Democratic Party’s candidate for the Presidency of the United States, Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris.”

Luttig played a now famous role in persuading then-Vice President Mike Pence to defy Trump and certify the 2020 presidential election. In a series of tweets drafted at the request of Pence’s attorney, Luttig spelled out in stark terms the legal rationale for Pence to reject the former president’s attempt to overturn Joe Biden’s victory.

Since then, Luttig has emerged as a preeminent constitutional critic of Trump. In endorsing Harris, Luttig argues that partisan distinctions must, in this election, be set aside in order to prevent the “singularly unfit” Trump from returning to the White House.

“In voting for Vice President Harris, I assume that her public policy views are vastly different from my own,” Luttig writes, “but I am indifferent in this election as to her policy views on any issues other than America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law, as I believe all Americans should be.”

But why should I vote FOR Harris?

 

[RavinDave]

But why should I vote FOR Harris?

Vote for Harris if you want a word salad diet and empty shelves in the grocery store.

 

[MontyPython]

But why should I vote FOR Harris?

Because she's not Trump.

Lame. I know.

Trump is a threat to our democracy. See: January 6th riot he incited because he lost the election.

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

Vote for Harris if you want a word salad diet and empty shelves in the grocery store.

Why will there be empty shelves at the grocery store?

 

[Sandman 423]

For all those wanting to know why you shouldn't vote for Trump, here it is.

About as simple and black and white as they come...


"Retired federal appeals court Judge J. Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative legal scholar put on the bench by President George H.W. Bush, is endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris over former President Donald Trump, whose candidacy he describes as an existential threat to American democracy.

It will be the first time Luttig, a veteran of two Republican administrations, has voted for a Democrat.

“In the presidential election of 2024 there is only one political party and one candidate for the presidency that can claim the mantle of defender and protector of America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law,” Luttig wrote in a statement obtained exclusively by CNN. “As a result, I will unhesitatingly vote for the Democratic Party’s candidate for the Presidency of the United States, Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris.”

Luttig played a now famous role in persuading then-Vice President Mike Pence to defy Trump and certify the 2020 presidential election. In a series of tweets drafted at the request of Pence’s attorney, Luttig spelled out in stark terms the legal rationale for Pence to reject the former president’s attempt to overturn Joe Biden’s victory.

Since then, Luttig has emerged as a preeminent constitutional critic of Trump. In endorsing Harris, Luttig argues that partisan distinctions must, in this election, be set aside in order to prevent the “singularly unfit” Trump from returning to the White House.

“In voting for Vice President Harris, I assume that her public policy views are vastly different from my own,” Luttig writes, “but I am indifferent in this election as to her policy views on any issues other than America’s Democracy, the Constitution, and the Rule of Law, as I believe all Americans should be.”

Trump is such an existential threat to democracy (Someone got his talking points) that he is not only not voting for Trump, but voting for a candidate that is a full blown Socialist at best. That doesn't make sense.

 

[hog88]

Because she's not Trump.

Lame. I know.

You gotta do better than that. When you cast your vote you're voting FOR that person no matter what you want to tell yourself.

 

[hog88]

Why will there be empty shelves at the grocery store?

If she gets her price controls enacted.

 

[Sandman 423]

But why should I vote FOR Harris?

French Fry Fridays?

 

[evillawyer]

The only use of the min wage is to pump up wages for union labor. It's not useful in any other way

Run with it then. Tell all those regular joes that there should be no minimum wage, and that unions are to blame for their troubles. And tell all those seniors that they should get off the government teet. If they didn't plan well for retirement or a medical emergency, then eff off, that's your own fault. Also, make sure you close with how much you love Jesus and believe in his teachings.

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

If she gets her price controls enacted.

That will never get through Congress

 

[appvol]

Because she's not Trump.

Lame. I know.

Trump is a threat to our democracy. See: January 6th riot he incited because he lost the election.

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

View attachment 668645

What time were those sent out?

 

[hog88]

That will never get through Congress

I don't believe she plans on going through congress to enact them. But should the Dems get control of both houses she will have a clear path to get them instituted.

 

[RavinDave]

Why will there be empty shelves at the grocery store?

Consequence of price controls on the food supply.

 

[luthervol]

But why should I vote FOR Harris?

To keep trump OUT.

 

[hog88]

Run with it then. Tell all those regular joes that there should be no minimum wage, and that unions are to blame for their troubles. And tell all those seniors that they should get off the government teet. If they didn't plan well for retirement or a medical emergency, then eff off, that's your own fault. Also, make sure you close with how much you love Jesus and believe in his teachings.

There should be no FEDERAL minimum wage. Nobody is saying states shouldn't or can't enact their own minimum wage standard.

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

Consequence of price controls on the food supply.

See my response to Hog

 

[hog88]

To keep trump OUT.

That is a dumb argument for why anyone should vote FOR a candidate.

 

[utvolpj]

Run with it then. Tell all those regular joes that there should be no minimum wage, and that unions are to blame for their troubles. And tell all those seniors that they should get off the government teet. If they didn't plan well for retirement or a medical emergency, then eff off, that's your own fault. Also, make sure you close with how much you love Jesus and believe in his teachings.

No regular Joe makes min wage. The seniors on the teat are the ones who have put this country in peril. I'm not much of a church goer at this time

 

[RavinDave]

See my response to Hog

Assuming it DOES get imposed, by hook or by crook. I do not underestimate how devious the Dems can be.