What authority does the vice president have in that area? We got the electoral count reform act, but her vote wasn’t needed, if I recall correctly.
What are the legitimate election integrity concerns and what is the basis for federal action?
The last several federal investigations of election integrity didn’t really find any legitimate concerns and the 100+ lawsuits over the last couple of elections have turned up bupkis.
IMO, the first thing on her “cons” list is bad policy. She seems to be making populist campaign promises, like capping various prices, that she probably can’t grant but that exhibit a troubling lack of understanding of the unintended consequences that would be set off by those measures.
Yeah, I admit, I was being a bit of a smartass on the "her authority" issue. My understanding is that her responsibilities as VP is essentially ministerial, and that the she has never had the authority to overturn any elections results. Again, I know, I was being a smartass, and that isn't always the way to win friends and influence people.
As to legitimate election integrity concerns, well, there are many. Just this week we learned the Oregon DMV who mistakenly registered more than 1200 non-citizens to vote. My home state of NC had a self-described "glitch" that allowed non-citizens to register to vote; that was corrected in 2022, so I presume those non-citizens could vote in 2020. Virginia announced they had 19000 dead people on their voter rolls in 2023. Yesterday a post in the election fraud thread presumed to show a simple hack of a voting machine. Etc, etc, etc.
Please don't misunderstand my point. I am not claiming some level of massive voter fraud that made the difference in the 2020 elections. What I am stating is that there are real issues within the processes of our electoral system that cause concern among reasonable people as to the way our elections are carried out and our votes are counted. The fact that only one of our two political parties seems concerned about these issues makes the issue partisan.
I don't claim Harris has any constitutional or statutory authority to change anything. What I do claim is that she is VP, and, by her President's assertions, an active member of the current administration. She is running for president claiming she is the most qualified, in part based on her experience as VP. Her failure to use her pulpit to push for electoral reforms to address legitimate issues is, in my opinion, far more likely to lead to disputes about the integrity of this November's election than anything trump has to say. I can only presume that is intentional on her part.
And yes, the dominant reason not to vote for Harris is bad policy. I am just not persuaded that her actions related to our elections is one of the top reasons to vote
for her, but that may have been you, as I was earlier, being a smartass as well.
Cheers,
RW
Edit:
@RockyTop85, just fyi,
@CobbVol just posted a link to a story about 747,000 voters being purged from NC electoral rolls (see the election fraud thread).
This is what I mean when I talk about perception of election reliability. 700 thousand+! That is 10% of the voters in the state. I have no idea if any of these have ever “voted”, but it is the people’s trust in our processes that I am concerned about.
If people don’t trust democracy, there is no saving it.