2024 Presidential Race

[TrippieRedd]

Whether you're left or right, that's a well-done, impactful ad.

Trump for President!

 

[OrangeTsar]

They can’t just suspend the Electoral College. They would have to amend the Constitution, and that will never happen in today’s political environment.

True; but just expressing that sentiment is deeply concerning. It shows the deep seated democrat disdain for any rule that hinders their quest for absolute power, even the core pillars of the American Republic.
Ends always justify the means for the dims. But this is extreme even for them. Same with the desire to eliminate the Fillibuster; which, even though not in the Constitution, is a long standing norm in our system.
When they are losing; the first impulse of the left is to rewrite the rulebook.

 

[InVOLuntary]

True; but just expressing that sentiment is deeply concerning. It shows the deep seated democrat disdain for any rule that hinders their quest for absolute power, even the core pillars of the American Republic.
Ends always justify the means for the dims. But this is extreme even for them. Same with the desire to eliminate the Fillibuster; which, even though not in the Constitution, is a long standing norm in our system.
When they are losing; the first impulse of the left is to rewrite the rulebook.

Don't forget one of the most concerning, at least to me, is stacking the supreme court.

 

[OrangeTsar]

Don't forget one of the most concerning, at least to me, is stacking the supreme court.

This may be Walz preemptively laying the groundwork for the excuses that will be required for why they lost come November

 

[InVOLuntary]

This may be Walz preemptively laying the groundwork for the excuses that will be required for why they lost come November

I could accept that but it's not just Walz. Many in the democrat party have called for that.

 

[Buddy’s Bandit]

Whether you're left or right, that's a well-done, impactful ad.

Easy to find a couple people (employees?) to make these remarks (2025 debunked many times). It’s another thing when your employees give up on you because of WHO you are and WHAT you are doing.

Substack: VP Kamala Harris Had 92-Percent Staff Turnover During Her First Three Years

Chaos reigns on the vice president’s staff. And Harris tried to hide it by claiming that her office is not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

www.openthebooks.com

 

[mrMet]

 

[Buddy’s Bandit]

Maybe the reason she has gone to the air-waves for hard hitting interviews with Colbert (shared a beer during her interview), Stern , and The View. All asked leading questions begging for her to give the right answers and SHE FAILED TO DO SO!! Example, on The View she was asked if there was anything she would have done differently than Biden over the last 4 years ….. her answer - no! She answered this in light of the fact she has been campaigning on being a change-agent. These people are clueless.

I think the media is going to give up and start asking more probing questions. To not do this will further display their corruption and complicity for this administration. I predict the numbers will continue to slip at even a faster rate.

 

[BreatheUT]

I’m hopeful for that. There’s also a chance the polls have corrected

There seems to be an increase in desperation from the Harris campaign when you see her picking up on friendly circuits. There are a lot of swings back and forth as normal this is a wild ride. Trump appears to be in good position while Harris seems to be more unliked as each day passes.

 

[Vol8188]

There seems to be an increase in desperation from the Harris campaign when you see her picking up on friendly circuits. There are a lot of swings back and forth as normal this is a wild ride. Trump appears to be in good position while Harris seems to be more unliked as each day passes.

Harris is for sure happy with the compressed timeline. Her goal is to run as generic democrat. Just be an unknown with a D beside her name.

 

[McDad]

Harris is for sure happy with the compressed timeline. Her goal is to run as generic democrat. Just be an unknown with a D beside her name.

Not a bad strategy. Be as under-the-radar as possible. Let Trump beat himself.

 

[Vol8188]

Not a bad strategy. Be as under-the-radar as possible. Let Trump beat himself.

There was a good poll awhile back and it showed that generic R beat Biden consistently and generic D beat Trump consistently.

It’s weird that our system continually produces such unpopular candidates.

 

[McDad]

There was a good poll awhile back and it showed that generic R beat Biden consistently and generic D beat Trump consistently.

It’s weird that our system continually produces such unpopular candidates.

I wish there was a different primary system. Something like 4 regionals and a national. With the availability of streaming services, it should not be that challenging. But that system would remove some control from the Parties...and that's a non-negotiable.

 

[Vol8188]

That’s so insane. I thought it was fake at first

 

[Sandman 423]

There was a good poll awhile back and it showed that generic R beat Biden consistently and generic D beat Trump consistently.

It’s weird that our system continually produces such unpopular candidates.

I Truly believe that good people won't ever make it through the primaries anymore. Liars and cheats have the advantage in today's environment.

 

[mrMet]

Another real gem here

 

[n_huffhines]

Interesting

 

[hog88]

Interesting

View attachment 685242

You probably should read into their methodology they used to come to those numbers.

 

[n_huffhines]

You probably should read into their methodology they used to come to those numbers.

Can you summarize?

 

[evillawyer]

America First! And his stupid bibles were made in ... Wait for it, wait for it ... CHINA. I understand people can get duped by a snake oil salesman once or twice, but you goobers gladly do it over and over again.

 

[hog88]

Can you summarize?

Biggest glaring problem is they are counting an increase in revenue by letting the Trump era tax cuts expire (for Harris) and extending them as a cost (for Trump). They are also figuring in massive increases in revenue from the tax increases Harris proposes. History shows that in most cases revenue decreases when tax rates are increased.

The Fiscal Impact of the Harris and Trump Campaign Plans | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

America First! And his stupid bibles were made in ... Wait for it, wait for it ... CHINA. I understand people can get duped by a snake oil salesman once or twice, but you goobers gladly do it over and over again.

From the deranged lunatic Keith Olbermann of all people folks ....

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[n_huffhines]

Biggest glaring problem is they are counting an increase in revenue by letting the Trump era tax cuts expire (for Harris) and extending them as a cost (for Trump). They are also figuring in massive increases in revenue from the tax increases Harris proposes. History shows that in most cases revenue decreases when tax rates are increased.

The Fiscal Impact of the Harris and Trump Campaign Plans | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Is that true? I thought they were pretty good about fiddling with it to get a short term result. The data I saw showed that from about 1965 to 2015 (based on my memory), no matter what they did with federal tax code, it would move up and down a couple % points, but in the long run it always returned to 18-19% of GDP because it takes time to adjust to the new laws.

 

[evillawyer]

From the deranged lunatic Keith Olbermann of all people folks ....

View attachment 685243

And the bloomberg news article he links? You deny that too?

You're one of the goobers who can't wait to drink from Trump's firehose of lies.

This you?