hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 116,231
- Likes
- 167,362
it would be ironically funny if it wasn't so cliche.
Lincoln was heavily disliked. even in the north during the Civil War. he only had 55% of the popular vote in 1864, and thats taking from the very pro-Lincoln areas in the north. imagine if Trump only polled at 55% in the south where he had the most support. the messaging on Lincoln only changed after his assassination.
a lot of FDRs popularity is driven from the extremely friendly media, most Americans didn't even know he had polio and was wheel chair bound, makes Biden's sharp as a tack media look down right honest because at least that is somewhat subjective. a lot of the measures he took were busy body efforts whose actual impact are questioned. with some saying the New Deal prolonged our recovery, not sped it up.
IIRC the money FDR threw around came with a lot strings.FDR also signed EO# 8985 which gave him/his administration the power to censor the media. He also had the FCC strip broadcast licenses from radio stations that reported negative stories about him and his administration, that was prior to WWII.
There were plenty of radical idiots on the fringe; so many that they largely drowned out the more sensible and reasonable people who needed to be listened to. What would have helped tremendously is if the idiot fringe (which isn't the entire fringe) would have been quieted by the mainstream public instead of encouraged.you implied that the fringe views were coming from people behaving like radical idiots. they weren't radical and weren't idiots and used actual science and data to arrive at their conclusions. labeling that as radical or idiotic is continuing to be anti-science
There were plenty of radical idiots on the fringe; so many that they largely drowned out the more sensible and reasonable people who needed to be listened to. What would have helped tremendously is if the idiot fringe (which isn't the entire fringe) would have been quieted by the mainstream public instead of encouraged.
Which was ALWAYS my position. And not just with Covid.
Threatening to invade, nope, they actually did it.I don't believe Russia was threatening invading Ukraine during the Obama administration but you already knew that right.....? Maybe not
FDR definitely had headaches (look at Wicker vs Filburn) but both FDR and Lincoln are enshrined in Mount Rushmore, consistently rank in top 5-10 all-time as Presidents, are iconic Presidents well known even outside the USA, etc.
At the time, they were very popular. The Southern Democrats emerged because of FDR. I have grandparents that lived through the era and adored FDR until his death. It was hard to find anyone from that generation that hated FDR.
why not? we clearly don't have a fixed amount of money in this nation, as inflation keeps reminding us.
seriously how is everyone else hurt if wages/wealth are going up everywhere, but one group is moving up faster than the rest?
Oh I can tell you that my grandparents hated him.
FDR and Lincoln get the benefit of being the victors in war. That's the reason their actual acts are whitewashed and glorified.
Yeah, we'd be better off if we went to a more state run model for everything. That way everyone is equal and no individual can amass more wealth than the average.
In time, it breeds resentment. And when the next big downturn occurs -- and it is inevitable that it will just by the nature of things-- you'll have hundreds of millions of people learning that maybe a few hundred have extraordinary wealth, which breeds natural resentment.
Consider this. In one 24 hour period ten people made $65 billion. That could have made 65,000 people millionaires, for life.