He didn't say a word about government, he said nations.
Governments evolve......as they should.
You guys are amusing.
Whoa there, chief. Pj mentioned nations and YOU brought up those countries as having "streaks" in response to socialism hasn't worked. The only one who has linked the socialism discussion with those countries is you.And you guys are claiming those revolutions started because the government became to socialistic?
And I'm the one who doesn't know history.............LMFAO
lol....there sparky.Whoa there, chief. Pj mentioned nations and YOU brought up those countries as having "streaks" in response to socialism hasn't worked. The only one who has linked the socialism discussion with those countries is you.
All of the countries I listed are more socialistic than the US. And have been around longer than us.
lol....there sparky.
I asked for him, or anyone, to name "nations" and got zilch as a response.
That pretty much says it all.
"they just didn't do socialism right. We totally know the way now"
So we'll add history to the growing list of things you don't understand.
What is it you think I am trying to debate?There hasn't been a form of government/economic system that has produced more sustained wealth for more individuals over the last 200 years than the US. It is a simple fact. You can argue that mercantilism/imperialism created more wealth for the monarchs in England, France, and Spain but that is an antiquated system. The most powerful economic nation in Europe is modeled after the US and that is Germany. The most powerful economic nations in Asia, outside of China's forced labor system but even they evolved away from Communism, are South Korea and Japan. Both were modeled after the US economies. Yes there are some very wealthy Middle Eastern nations that relatively small populations with large oil reserves but that isn't duplicable. There really is nothing to debate
Until the libertarians get serious about being something other than the „legalize drugs“ party as their main plank, I will continue to treat them as a joke. You win not by creating a whole party structure from the ground up. You win by taking over and co-opting one of the two existing parties. The left had no problem bringing the Democrat party to the left of Stalin. Why do conservatives feel they cannot pull the GOP similarly to the right?Yes. Wasted. If you want to rally the Libertarian base and try to become a legitimate threat to actually win an election sometime in the future, knock yourself out. I'm all for it. However, until that happens, when it comes to the general election, any vote for a third party candidate is currently a wasted vote. You may as well have not voted at all.
What is it you think I am trying to debate?
I was responding to this post.
"There's a reason no nation lasts forever. This move left will essentially end our great experiment if allowed to continue"
It sounds as if he is implying that nations collapse because they move to far left.
I just asked for examples.
But not as democratic socialist or socialist states.